ArticleFrontiers in health services2026
Cross-cultural adaptation of an implementation science glossary into simplified Chinese: study protocol.
Article in Frontiers in health services, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Implementation science (IS) relies on standardized terminology, yet existing glossaries are largely English and Western-centric, creating risks of misinterpretation in other contexts. In China, with over one billion Chinese speakers and a rapidly expanding IS community, the absence of a unified glossary hinders training and knowledge exchange. We report a prospective, multi-stage cultural and linguistic adaptation study of the Implementation Science Research Glossary produced by the Centre for Implementation Science at King's College London, UK, from its original English version into Simplified Chinese. Methods: This study follows an established cross-cultural adaptation framework, modified to reflect the nature of a glossary rather than a psychometric instrument. The process includes: (1) forward translation of the English glossary into Simplified Chinese by a bilingual translator with IS expertise; (2) independent back translation by another bilingual individual blinded to the original glossary; (3) structured reconciliation involving the forward translator, back translator, and an additional reviewer with IS knowledge; (4) first expert panel review-conducted by 5 experts in IS and public health, who will also participate in the final review-to assess semantic, idiomatic, experiential, and conceptual equivalence, leading to a refined version of the glossary; consensus will be defined Discussion: The study will produce the first, to our knowledge, culturally and linguistically adapted IS glossary for Chinese-speaking contexts. This resource is expected to enhance clarity and accessibility of implementation concepts, supporting research and practice in local settings. The documented adaptation process will provide a methodological reference for future translation of IS resources in other languages.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.