ArticleEuropean journal of radiology open2026
Prognostic and predictive value of radiomics-based imaging features in patients with colorectal liver metastasis receiving radioembolisation in first-line setting.
Article in European journal of radiology open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence Across the Cancer Theranostics Workflow: Critical Appraisal of Current Evidence and Future Clinical Translation.Molecular imaging and biology · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence across oncologic theranostics: evidence for patient stratification, dosimetry, and adaptive radiopharmaceutical therapy.Frontiers in nuclear medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the prognostic and predictive value of radiomics-based imaging markers in colorectal liver metastasis treated with chemotherapy alone or combined with selective internal radiation therapy in the first-line setting. Methods: This was a post-hoc retrospective analysis of the randomized controlled SIRFLOX trial. 491 patients (333 male, median age 63 [range, 28-83] years) with available baseline Computed Tomography (CT) images were included in this analysis. All lesions were segmented automatically in baseline CT with an nnU-net and evaluated against manual segmentation of 80 patients. Quantitative features of tumor segmentations were computed using PyRadiomics. Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression was used to identify relevant prognostic factors, and potential predictive factors were modeled as interaction with the treatment arm. Results: 239 patients had been randomized to FOLFOX alone arm, and 252 patients to the experimental arm. There was no difference in overall survival between treatment arms. A Cox proportional hazards model with LASSO regularization identified 20 prognostic factors. In addition to seven clinical parameters and eight radiomics-based prognostic markers, the LASSO model identified five interaction effects with treatment, highlighting two radiomics features, "shape - Maximum2DiameterSlice" and "glrlm - RunEntropy," as particularly relevant. When patients were categorized into two risk groups based on the model's survival predictions ≥ 50%, patients with high-risk had significantly shorter overall survival than the low-risk group (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Radiomics-based imaging features of liver metastases in pretreatment CT images can identify colorectal cancer patients with poor outcome and potential benefit from combined therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.