ReviewCureus2026
The Evolving Role of Extracorporeal Carbon Dioxide Removal in Acute Respiratory Failure: A Narrative Review.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal (ECCO₂R) has emerged as a supportive therapy for patients with acute respiratory failure, particularly when refractory hypercapnia and respiratory acidosis persist despite standard management. This narrative review summarizes the physiological rationale, current evidence, and clinical applications of ECCO₂R in modern critical care practice. ECCO₂R removes carbon dioxide directly from the bloodstream, thereby facilitating lung-protective ventilation strategies and potentially reducing ventilator-induced lung injury. The technique has been primarily evaluated in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD). In these settings, ECCO₂R may enable the use of lower tidal volumes and reduced airway pressures, and in selected patients, it may decrease the need for invasive mechanical ventilation. Although ECCO₂R has been shown to improve carbon dioxide clearance, correct respiratory acidosis, and optimize ventilatory parameters, randomized trials have not demonstrated a definitive mortality benefit. Its clinical application is also limited by device-related complications, including bleeding, thrombosis, and hemolysis. Furthermore, outcomes are influenced by technical factors such as cannula configuration, blood flow rate, membrane efficiency, and anticoagulation strategy. Ongoing technological advancements and well-designed clinical trials are needed to better define the role of ECCO₂R in contemporary critical care practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.