Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42022659›Full record

ArticleHealth science reports2026

Protocol for a Pre-Post Field Trial of a Home Hearing and Vision Care Program for Older Australians With Diverse Cognitive Abilities and Hearing and/or Vision Impairment.

Melinda Toomey, Helen Gurteen, Bec Bennett, Dayna Cenin, Najwan El-Saifi, Melanie Ferguson, Yuanyuan Gu, Chyrisse Heine, Lisa Keay, Sheela Kumaran and 12 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health science reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Melinda ToomeyCenter for Hearing Research, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences The University of Queensland Brisbane Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9552-4768
Helen GurteenCenter for Hearing Research, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences The University of Queensland Brisbane Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-2924-2802
Bec BennettNational Acoustic Laboratories Macquarie University Sydney Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9427-5539
Dayna CeninBrightwater Research Center Perth Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2598-7035
Najwan El-SaifiCenter for Hearing Research, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences The University of Queensland Brisbane Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4651-0810
Melanie FergusonSchool of Allied Health Curtin University Perth Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8096-869X
Yuanyuan GuMacquarie University Center for the Health Economy, Macquarie Business School & Australian Institute of Health Innovation Macquarie University Sydney Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3816-9106
Chyrisse HeineInstitute of Health and Well-being Federation University Australia Ballarat Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2213-1795
Lisa KeaySchool of Optometry and Vision Science UNSW Sydney Sydney Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2215-0678
Sheela KumaranSchool of Optometry and Vision Science UNSW Sydney Sydney Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6913-4865
Sabrina LenzenCenter for the Business and Economics of Health The University of Queensland Brisbane Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9924-5478
Iracema LeroiDepartment of Psychiatry, School of Medicine Global Brain Health Institute, Trinity College Dublin Dublin Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1822-3643
Judy A LowthianSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine Monash University Melbourne Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9780-5256
Carly MeyerBolton Clarke Research Institute Brisbane Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2268-3055
Leander MitchellSchool of Psychology The University of Queensland Brisbane Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3595-2100
John NewallDepartment of Linguistics, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, The Australian Hearing Hub Macquarie University Sydney Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7159-9677
Nancy A PachanaSchool of Psychology The University of Queensland Brisbane Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8927-4205
Marianne PianoDepartment of Optometry and Vision Sciences, Melbourne School of Health Sciences University of Melbourne Melbourne Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0714-6339
Smriti RaichandMacquarie University Center for the Health Economy, Macquarie Business School & Australian Institute of Health Innovation Macquarie University Sydney Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3419-5179
Emma ScanlanHearing Australia Sydney Australia.
Hamid R SohrabiCenter for Healthy Ageing Murdoch University Perth Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8017-8682
Piers DawesCenter for Hearing Research, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences The University of Queensland Brisbane Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3180-9884

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aims: Hearing and vision impairments are prevalent health conditions among older adults, negatively affecting functional ability, mental and social well-being, quality of life and increasing the likelihood of transition to long-term care. Sensory impairments are also common comorbidities with dementia, compounding the impact of dementia. Early intervention to optimize sensory function may help older adults stay in their homes longer. The Australian government's 'Homecare Package' provides affordable care services to support older adults with complex needs at home; however, there is a lack of support for hearing and vision needs. This trial will investigate whether a sensory support intervention enhances the quality of life and other outcomes for older adults (aged 65 years or older) with diverse cognitive abilities and hearing and/or vision impairments, as well as their care partners. Methods: This manuscript presents a study protocol for a home-based sensory support intervention for older adults with hearing and/or vision impairment who receive home care services. A pre-post study will determine the impact and cost-effectiveness of a 12-week intervention. Key outcome measures include health-related quality of life, sensory and cognitive functional ability, relationships, mental well-being and health resource utilization. All outcomes will be assessed before the intervention (baseline) and 13- and 26-weeks post-intervention commencement. Conclusion: This manuscript describes the protocol for a pre-post intervention trial. A parallel and complementary process evaluation will be detailed in a separate publication. If effective, the intervention may assist older adults to improve their quality of life and remain living in their own homes. Findings will generate evidence for hearing and vision support as part of home care services.

Indexed as

dementiahearing impairmenthome carevision impairment

Identifiers

PMID42022659
PMCPMC13098140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.