ArticleHealth science reports2026
Risk of Accidental Falls Among Informal Caregivers.
Article in Health science reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Informal caregiving has increased over recent decades. Caregivers may face an increased risk of accidental falls because of care tasks or their consequences, such as fatigue. However, this association has not been investigated. Therefore, we aimed to examine whether giving personal care to someone at home increases fall risk. Methods: Using longitudinal repeated measures for adults aged over 50 years in 17 European countries, with biennial data collection in 2004-2017 ( Results: Compared with the period of not giving care, the period of providing care was associated with higher fall risk (OR 1.19 [95% CI 1.05-1.35]). This association differed by baseline household income (below or above median). In higher-income households, there was no statistically significant difference in fall risk between the period giving and not giving care (OR 1.07 [95% CI 0.90, 1.26]). In contrast, in lower-income households, the caregiving period was associated with higher fall risk (OR 1.36 [95% CI 1.14-1.63]), which was equivalent to 29% (95% CI 12-46) increased probability of falls in caregiving periods. Fatigue, sleep problems, lower concentration, and behavioural changes jointly mediated 12% of the effect; thus, most of the effect of caregiving on falls is a direct effect. Conclusion: There was an increased fall risk among caregivers who provide personal care at home in lower-income households. Fatigue and other consequences of caregiving mediated only small effects. Other factors, such as lack of equipment and living space, may relate to mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.