ReviewHealth science reports2026
Preterm Neonatal Mortality and Its Associated Factors in Ethiopia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Review in Health science reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Neonatal Mortality and Its Associated Factors Among Neonates in Ethiopia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Public health challenges · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Preterm neonatal mortality is the leading cause of death among children under 5 years of age globally, with the highest burden in low- and middle-income countries. Evidence on the national pooled prevalence of preterm neonatal mortality and its determinants in Ethiopia is limited. This study aimed to estimate the pooled prevalence of preterm neonatal mortality and identify its associated factors in Ethiopia. Methods: A comprehensive search was carried out in Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, Google Scholar, and African Journals Online. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyzes (PRISMA) guidelines were followed to report the review findings. Data were extracted using a standardized Excel spreadsheet, and the quality of the included studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. A random-effects meta-analysis model was used to estimate the pooled prevalence with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Heterogeneity across studies was assessed using I² statistic, and subgroup analyzes were performed to explore potential sources of heterogeneity. Results: Thirty-one eligible articles were included in the analysis. The pooled prevalence of preterm neonatal mortality was 28.58% (95% CI: 23.08%-34.08%). Male sex (AHR = 1.26, 95% CI: 1.05-1.47), gestational age ≤ 32 weeks (AHR = 1.59, 95% CI: 1.02-2.16), lack of kangaroo mother care (AHR = 1.86, 95% CI: 1.05-2.67), asphyxia (AHR = 1.92, 95% CI: 1.48-2.35), a fifth-minute APGAR score < 7 (AHR = 1.78, 95% CI: 1.25-2.32), respiratory distress (AHR = 1.69, 95% CI: 1.50-1.87), hypothermia (AHR = 1.28, 95% CI: 1.01-1.55), and sepsis (AOR = 1.60, 95% CI: 1.07-2.14) were identified as risk factors for preterm neonatal mortality. In contrast, antenatal care utilization (AHR = 0.65, 95% CI: 0.36-0.94) and antenatal steroid exposure (AHR = 0.65, 95% CI: 0.31-0.99) were protective factors against preterm neonatal mortality. Conclusion: More than one in four preterm neonates died in Ethiopia. Several neonatal and clinical factors, including male sex, very low gestational age of 32 weeks or less, lack of kangaroo mother care, asphyxia, a low fifth-minute APGAR score, respiratory distress, hypothermia, and sepsis, were identified as significant predictors of preterm neonatal mortality and require timely intervention, appropriate medication, and close follow-up. Conversely, antenatal care utilization and antenatal steroid exposure were found to be protective factors, highlighting the importance of quality maternal and newborn care services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.