ArticleHealth science reports2026
Asundexian Versus Apixaban in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation.
Article in Health science reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Asundexian Versus Apixaban in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation.Health science reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Anticoagulation therapy is central to the prevention of thromboembolic disorders but is limited by bleeding complications associated with traditional agents such as warfarin and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). Factor XIa inhibition has emerged as a novel strategy aimed at reducing thrombotic risk while preserving hemostasis. Asundexian, a selective Factor XIa inhibitor, represents a promising advancement in this evolving therapeutic landscape. Methods: This narrative review synthesizes available preclinical and clinical evidence on Asundexian, with a focus on its pharmacological mechanism, efficacy, safety profile, and potential clinical applications. Key data from major clinical trials, including PACIFIC-AF and PACIFIC-STROKE, were reviewed to evaluate its role in contemporary anticoagulation therapy. Results: Clinical trial evidence indicates that Asundexian effectively reduces the incidence of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with atrial fibrillation and those at risk of recurrent ischemic stroke. Importantly, these benefits are achieved with a lower risk of major bleeding compared to conventional anticoagulants. Asundexian's fixed dosing regimen, oral administration, and lack of routine coagulation monitoring enhance treatment convenience and patient adherence. Emerging data also suggest potential applicability in other conditions requiring long-term anticoagulation, such as venous thromboembolism and acute coronary syndrome. Conclusion: Asundexian offers a novel and potentially safer approach to anticoagulation by selectively targeting Factor XIa, balancing thromboembolic protection with reduced bleeding risk. While early clinical results are encouraging, further large-scale and long-term studies are required to establish its safety and efficacy across diverse patient populations. Asundexian has the potential to redefine standards of care in anticoagulation therapy and improve patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.