ReviewFrontiers in pharmacology2026
Integrative biomarker and drug target discovery in osteosarcoma: traditional experimental approaches and AI-enabled insights.
Review in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Identification and validation of key host genes associated with porcine H1N1 infection based on integrated machine learning algorithms.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Osteosarcoma is the most common primary malignant bone tumor and remains a major clinical challenge due to frequent metastasis, chemoresistance, and pronounced molecular heterogeneity. Despite substantial advances in understanding disease biology, clinically actionable biomarkers and therapeutic targets that can reliably support precision treatment decisions remain limited. Traditional experimental approaches have yielded important mechanistic insights into osteosarcoma pathogenesis, but their hypothesis-driven nature and limited scalability constrain the ability to capture complex regulatory interactions. Recent progress in high-throughput sequencing and multi-omics profiling, together with advances in artificial intelligence (AI), has enabled more systematic interrogation of high-dimensional molecular landscapes. By integrating heterogeneous datasets, AI-based analytical frameworks can identify composite biomarker patterns, regulatory hubs, and candidate druggable vulnerabilities that better reflect tumor complexity and treatment heterogeneity. In parallel, computational strategies for drug sensitivity prediction and drug repurposing are emerging as complementary tools for accelerating therapeutic hypothesis generation and prioritizing candidate interventions in osteosarcoma. In this mini-review, we summarize recent progress in biomarker discovery and therapeutic target identification, with an emphasis on how traditional experimental evidence and AI-driven analyses function as complementary components within an integrated discovery-to-validation framework. We discuss key challenges in translational validation and highlight future directions for integrating data-driven discovery with pharmacological and clinical research to advance precision therapy for osteosarcoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.