Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42022572›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in pharmacology2026

Integrative biomarker and drug target discovery in osteosarcoma: traditional experimental approaches and AI-enabled insights.

Zhihao Gao, Chongqin Wu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Zhihao GaoDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Chong Gang General Hospital, Chongqing, China.
Chongqin WuDepartment of Orthopedics, Chong Gang General Hospital, Chongqing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Osteosarcoma is the most common primary malignant bone tumor and remains a major clinical challenge due to frequent metastasis, chemoresistance, and pronounced molecular heterogeneity. Despite substantial advances in understanding disease biology, clinically actionable biomarkers and therapeutic targets that can reliably support precision treatment decisions remain limited. Traditional experimental approaches have yielded important mechanistic insights into osteosarcoma pathogenesis, but their hypothesis-driven nature and limited scalability constrain the ability to capture complex regulatory interactions. Recent progress in high-throughput sequencing and multi-omics profiling, together with advances in artificial intelligence (AI), has enabled more systematic interrogation of high-dimensional molecular landscapes. By integrating heterogeneous datasets, AI-based analytical frameworks can identify composite biomarker patterns, regulatory hubs, and candidate druggable vulnerabilities that better reflect tumor complexity and treatment heterogeneity. In parallel, computational strategies for drug sensitivity prediction and drug repurposing are emerging as complementary tools for accelerating therapeutic hypothesis generation and prioritizing candidate interventions in osteosarcoma. In this mini-review, we summarize recent progress in biomarker discovery and therapeutic target identification, with an emphasis on how traditional experimental evidence and AI-driven analyses function as complementary components within an integrated discovery-to-validation framework. We discuss key challenges in translational validation and highlight future directions for integrating data-driven discovery with pharmacological and clinical research to advance precision therapy for osteosarcoma.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencebiomarkersdrug sensitivity predictionmulti-omics integrationosteosarcomaprecision pharmacologytherapeutic targets

Identifiers

PMID42022572
PMCPMC13095689

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.