ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2026
A single-center, observational, retrospective, case control study of rituximab for the treatment of interstitial pneumonia associated with autoimmune features.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) and features of autoimmunity who do not meet the classification criteria for a specific autoimmune rheumatic disease are diagnosed with interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features (IPAF). The treatment approach to ILD in this setting remains undefined. We conducted an observational retrospective study to examine the use of rituximab in IPAF. Methods: Patients from the Mount Sinai Respiratory Institute Interstitial Lung Disease Registry were included if they met the 2015 classification criteria for IPAF and were treated with at least one dose of rituximab. Clinical improvement was defined as improvement in four domains after the use of rituximab including pulmonary function tests, CT chest findings, need for respiratory related hospitalization and survival. Results: Of the 791 patients in the registry, 14 patients met the criteria for IPAF and received at least one dose of rituximab. Nineteen patients with IPAF were identified to serve as the control group. More patients in the rituximab group received immunosuppressive medications. The percentage of patients with improved, stable, or worsened pulmonary function tests was similar in both groups. Frequency of oxygen use, incidence of infection, respiratory related admissions and overall mortality was similar in both groups. Conclusion: The majority of patients with IPAF receiving rituximab showed improvement or stability in their pulmonary function. Although both groups had similar outcomes, more patients in the rituximab group were on baseline immunosuppressive therapy suggesting refractory ILD. We suggest rituximab is a treatment option for patients with moderate to severe IPAF who progress despite standard therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.