ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2026
Trazodone effectiveness in depression (TED): a comparative evaluation of effect sizes trazodone extended release and SSRIs in the treatment of major depressive disorder.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Major depressive disorder (MDD) constitutes a significant global mental health concern. Although selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are first-line treatment, their effectiveness may be limited by adverse effects including anhedonia, emotional blunting, sleep disturbances, and sexual dysfunction. Trazodone, a serotonin antagonist and reuptake inhibitor, offers a more favorable tolerability profile, particularly in its extended-release (XR) formulation. Previous studies within the trazodone effectiveness in depression (TED) project demonstrated more pronounced improvements with trazodone XR compared to SSRIs in reducing depressive, anxiety, and insomnia symptoms. The present analysis extends these findings by comparing trazodone XR with SSRIs and quantifying the extent and clinical importance of treatment outcomes through effect size estimates. Methods: This single-center, non-randomized, open-label, 12-week naturalistic study-conducted as part of the TED project-included adults aged 18-65 diagnosed with MDD. Symptom severity and outcomes were assessed at baseline and weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12 using validated clinician- and self-rated scales. Cohen's d quantified the magnitude and clinical relevance of differences between trazodone XR and SSRIs. Results: Effect-size analyses demonstrated consistently greater and earlier improvements with trazodone XR versus SSRIs across all measures. In both self-rated (QIDS-SR) and clinician-rated (QIDS-CR; MADRS) scales assessing depressive symptoms, trazodone XR showed larger effect sizes from week 4, with further increases through week 12. Similar patterns were observed for anhedonia (SHAPS), anxiety (HAM-A) and insomnia (AIS), where trazodone XR produced greater and progressively increasing effect sizes, while SSRIs reached a plateau. These findings indicate a more robust and sustained therapeutic impact of trazodone XR, reflected by consistently higher effect-size magnitudes across domains. Discussion: Trazodone XR demonstrated greater and progressively increasing effect sizes compared with SSRIs, indicating a more sustained antidepressant response over 12 weeks. This trajectory, marked by continued symptom reduction without a linear response pattern, suggests a cumulative therapeutic effect potentially attributable to trazodone's multimodal serotonergic mechanism and favorable pharmacokinetics. By concurrently addressing mood, anxiety, and sleep-related domains, trazodone XR appears to facilitate both symptomatic improvement and broader functional stabilization. These findings highlight the need for randomized, controlled investigations to further elucidate its comparative efficacy and real-world relevance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.