Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42022549›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2026

Can ethical artificial intelligence aid infant and young child feeding support during conflict? A review of the experience and lessons learned from FHI 360's in Ukraine.

Alessandro Iellamo, Olena Rozhenko, Yuliia Strelchenko-Yankovska, Nataliia Kalashnyk, Inna Burta, Celestine Ekwuluo, Yelyzaveta Hryshyna, Oleksandra Firsova, Vitalii Sheremet

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Somalia's lifeline: Digitalization and AI.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Alessandro IellamoFHI 360, Crisis Response and Resilience, Washington, DC, United States.
Olena RozhenkoFHI 360 Nutrition, Crisis Response and Resilience Department, Dnipro, Ukraine.
Yuliia Strelchenko-YankovskaFHI 360 Nutrition, Crisis Response and Resilience Department, Dnipro, Ukraine.
Nataliia KalashnykFHI 360 Nutrition, Crisis Response and Resilience Department, Dnipro, Ukraine.
Inna BurtaFHI 360 Nutrition, Crisis Response and Resilience Department, Dnipro, Ukraine.
Celestine EkwuluoFHI 360 Nutrition, Crisis Response and Resilience Department, Dnipro, Ukraine.
Yelyzaveta HryshynaFHI 360 Nutrition, Crisis Response and Resilience Department, Dnipro, Ukraine.
Oleksandra FirsovaFHI 360 Nutrition, Crisis Response and Resilience Department, Dnipro, Ukraine.
Vitalii SheremetFHI 360 Nutrition, Crisis Response and Resilience Department, Dnipro, Ukraine.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The war in Ukraine has disrupted access to maternal and infant nutrition services, intensified commercial milk formula marketing risks, and increased demand for accessible, evidence-based breastfeeding support. To respond, FHI 360 and UNICEF Ukraine deployed Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility, safety, acceptability, and operational contribution of an AI-enabled hybrid counseling model to continuity and quality of Infant and Young Child Feeding in Emergencies services during protracted conflict, including its integration with facility-based counseling and mentorship systems and its potential influence on caregiver feeding practices and counseling quality. Methods: A convergent mixed-methods approach triangulated: (1) chatbot analytics (user characteristics, interaction volume, response quality); (2) facility counseling data from four conflict-affected oblasts; (3) structured competency assessments following >600 mentorship visits; and (4) qualitative feedback from caregivers and health workers. Governance, safety, and Code-compliance safeguards were assessed against the World Health Organization (WHO) AI ethics guidance, the Operational Guidance on Infant and Young Child Feeding in Emergencies (OG-IFE), and Ukraine's breastfeeding policies. Results: Between November 2024 and October 2025, 2,066 caregivers generated more than 38,000 chatbot interactions. Ninety-eight percent of answers met accuracy and safety criteria; one hallucination event was detected and corrected through real-time review. Caregivers used the system predominantly during periods of insecurity or when services were inaccessible, valuing its 24-h availability, emotional reassurance, and escalation to human counselors. In parallel, facility data showed improved quality of counseling, strengthened referral pathways, and increases in early initiation and exclusive breastfeeding among women receiving repeated support. Mentorship visits demonstrated competency gains among lactation counselors, enhanced adherence to the Code, and more consistent use of MoH-aligned counseling tools. Conclusion: An AI-enabled, human-supervised hybrid model is feasible, acceptable, and safe for sustaining breastfeeding and IYCF-E support during active conflict. When anchored in authoritative guidance and embedded within national systems, AI tools can complement skilled counselors, strengthen continuity of care, and uphold Code-compliant, evidence-based support for mothers and infants. To our knowledge, this is the first documented evaluation of an AI-enabled IYCF-E intervention implemented during an active conflict.

Indexed as

artificial intelligence for health and nutritionbreastfeeding counselingbreastfeeding in emergenciesbreastfeeding supportcomplementary feeding in emergenciesconflict-affected health and nutrition servicesdigital humanitarian assistanceinfant and young child feeding in emergencies

Identifiers

PMID42022549
PMCPMC13097993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.