Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42022540›Full record

ArticleEvolutionary applications2026

Landscape Genomic Analyses of

Ryan C Buck, H Scott Butterfield, Elizabeth Hiroyasu, Jeanette Howard, John Knapp, Zachary Principe, Victoria L Sork

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evolutionary applications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ryan C BuckDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology University of California Los Angeles California USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9905-5789
H Scott ButterfieldThe Nature Conservancy, California Program Sacramento California USA.
Elizabeth HiroyasuThe Nature Conservancy, California Program Sacramento California USA.
Jeanette HowardThe Nature Conservancy, California Program Sacramento California USA.
John KnappCatalina Island Conservancy Avalon California USA.
Zachary PrincipeThe Nature Conservancy, California Program Sacramento California USA.
Victoria L SorkDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology University of California Los Angeles California USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2677-1420

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Habitat destruction and climate change are two primary drivers of global biodiversity loss. Many contemporary ecological preserves and preserve networks are designed to protect species and the ecological and evolutionary processes that will maintain future biodiversity. However, it is challenging to identify where to locate preserves and how to manage them to meet these goals. One emerging conservation tool is landscape genomics, which allows us to identify populations that may be maladapted to future climate and thereby helps prioritize areas for acquisition (areas of high adaptedness), restoration (areas of low adaptedness), and management. Here, using whole genome sequence data of 171 adult trees, we studied the climate adaptedness of California populations of coast live oak (

Indexed as

coast live oakconservation genomicsland managementlandscape genomicsoak ecosystemsQuercus agrifoliarestoration

Identifiers

PMID42022540
PMCPMC13097008

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.