Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42022527›Full record

ReviewGastro hep advances2026

Refractory Ascites and the Alfapump.

Jasleen Singh, Jayza Calderon, Sammy Saab

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Gastro hep advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jasleen SinghDepartment of Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California.
Jayza CalderonDepartment of Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California.
Sammy SaabDepartment of Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ascites is often the first decompensation in patients with cirrhosis and is associated with reduced survival. The formation of ascites is complex and thought to be due to an increase in hydrostatic pressure, a decrease in oncotic pressure, and increased lymph production. Standard of care for ascites includes dietary sodium restriction, use of loop diuretics and aldosterone antagonists, large-volume paracentesis (LVP), and at times transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS). Alfapump was designed in response to the need for alternative treatments for patients with refractory ascites, particularly in those who are ineligible for TIPS. The initial PIONEER trial conducted in Europe demonstrated the benefit of Alfapump with reduced need for LVP and ultimately led to the commercial launch of the pump in Europe in 2012. The MOSAIC and POSEIDON trials not only proved the efficacy of the Alfapump but also provided an alternative to surgery by performing pump implantation with interventional radiology. While the benefit with reduced need for LVP has been shown in multiple studies, the risk of renal impairment and infections such as peritonitis have also been observed. The renal injury mostly responds to albumin, which should be considered in certain cases. The infection risk is mitigated with antibiotic prophylaxis and early treatment of confirmed infections. Consensus recommendations from Europe have also helped with best practices in patients with the pump. Premarket approval was granted by the Food and Drug Administration for the use of Alfapump in patients with cirrhosis and refractory or recurrent ascites in December 2024. In the United States, Alfapump may be a good alternative for cirrhotic patients with refractory ascites who are ineligible for TIPS and potentially as a bridge to liver transplantation.

Indexed as

AlfapumpCirrhosisRefractory AscitesTIPSTreatment

Identifiers

PMID42022527
PMCPMC13098585

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.