ArticleIEEE transactions on medical robotics and bionics2026
Interdisciplinary Dialogues on Surgical Data Science: Revising Its Benefits for Surgical Stakeholders and Patients.
Article in IEEE transactions on medical robotics and bionics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recent advancements in data science and robotic surgery have introduced significant opportunities and challenges in the field of healthcare. To assess their implications, a multidisciplinary panel of experts in medicine and computer science convened to evaluate the potential benefits, risks, and ethical considerations associated with these technologies. The discussion addressed critical topics, including the role of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in enhancing surgical decision-making, the integration of robotics to improve procedural precision, and the broader socioeconomic and psychological impacts on patients and their families. Particular attention was given to the perspectives of key surgical stakeholders, including healthcare professionals and institutions, as well as the implications for equity and accessibility in surgical care. This paper presents a synthesis of the key outcomes from the deliberations. By identifying research gaps and proposing strategic directions, the findings aim to serve as a foundational resource for future investigations and innovations in data-driven and robotic-assisted surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.