ArticleAesthetic surgery journal. Open forum2026
Ultrasound-Assisted Pocket Creation in Subglandular Breast Augmentation.
Article in Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Electrocautery remains the conventional technique for breast pocket dissection in augmentation, but it produces thermal injury, postoperative pain, and delayed recovery. Ultrasound-assisted liposuction devices may provide a less traumatic approach for subglandular breast augmentation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety, feasibility, and postoperative outcomes of real-time ultrasound-guided subglandular breast augmentation using ultrasonic dissection, hypothesizing that ultrasound-assisted dissection can be performed with minimum tissue trauma, postoperative pain, and recovery time. The authors conducted a prospective cohort including healthy women (aged 21-45 years) undergoing primary subglandular breast augmentation. All patients received real-time ultrasound-guided dissection using ultrasonic devices after tumescent infiltration. Outcomes included incision size, operative time, postoperative pain measured by visual analog scale (VAS), complications, and implant characteristics. The authors included 30 patients in the cohort. The mean age was 30 years (range, 22-45 years, standard deviation [SD] 4.9). The average implant volume was 278.5 cc (range, 205-375 cc, SD 38.9), with a mean incision size of 3.0 cm (SD ±0.34). The mean surgical time was 40.2 min (range, 24-55 min, SD 7.3). Pain intensity was minimal in the immediate postoperative period, with an average baseline VAS of 1.07 and a 24 h VAS of 1.7 (SD ±0.78). No patient reported the need for extra or stronger analgesic medication, nor did they declare having taken it. Image-guided ultrasonic subglandular dissection is technically feasible, safe, and well tolerated, with minimal pain, small incisions, and no major complications in short-term follow-up. This pilot study supports the concept of ultrasonic tissue separation in aesthetic breast surgery. Larger controlled studies with longer follow-up are needed to establish its role.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.