ArticleAesthetic surgery journal. Open forum2026
Use of Piezoelectric Devices in Closed Structural Rhinoplasty.
Article in Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Closed rhinoplasty techniques are gaining popularity once again as more and more patients demand them. The use of piezoelectric devices (PEDs) is also another popular practice in rhinoplasty surgeries recently to reduce postoperative edema and bruising. Objectives: The aim of this study was to propose a new technique in which all osteotomies in closed rhinoplasty surgeries can be performed using PEDs. Methods: A comparison was made between 274 patients who underwent closed piezo (CloPi) rhinoplasty and 120 patients who underwent closed rhinoplasty using conventional osteotomy. In the CloPi technique, all osteotomies, including lateral and transverse osteotomies, were performed with PEDs using straight and 90° curved tips. Preoperative and postoperative results obtained with the Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation (ROE) questionnaire were compared to evaluate aesthetic and functional results. Results: In the CloPi group, the mean age was 30.8 years (range, 18-60 years) and the mean follow-up period was 19.6 months, whereas in the control group, the mean age was 33.5 years (range, 18-61 years) and the mean follow-up period was 29.3 months. Significantly better results were obtained in the ROE questionnaire compared with preoperative values in both groups ( Conclusions: CloPi rhinoplasty is an easy and reliable technique in which all osteotomies can be performed with PEDs. Successful surgical results can be achieved with wide surgical dissection. Level of Evidence: 3 (Therapeutic).
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.