ArticlePreventive medicine reports2026
Are gynecologists prepared to offer anal cancer prevention services?: a qualitative study of barriers to implementation in the United States.
Article in Preventive medicine reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objectives: Training in anal cancer prevention (ACP) techniques is crucial to respond to increasing anal cancer rates in women. We explored what is necessary for gynecologists, specialists in lower genital tract and experts in HPV-related disease prevention, to incorporate ACP into routine practice. Methods: In 2022, we interviewed thirteen gynecologists practicing across three states (Florida, Georgia, Maryland) about current prevention practices, provider perceptions, and support needed to incorporate ACP into practice. We employed thematic content analysis to understand issues of implementation and categorized these themes following the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Results: Key themes included a need to demonstrate the importance of ACP to gynecologists; key barriers to ACP implementation focused on the lack of clinical guidelines and resulting uncertainty about value of these tests, need for additional training, already limited time with patients, logistical concerns related to laboratory capacity and insurance/billing and current reliance on referrals to other providers for ACP. Conclusion: Building on gynecologists' existing training to enhance their ability to conduct ACP and extending training to other providers is important to increase early intervention and reduce rates of anal cancer among women; pairing this with efforts to address systems-based barriers can facilitate widespread ACP adoption.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.