ArticleJOR spine2026
Feasibility of Smartphone-Derived Short-Interval Walking Tests for Monitoring Functional Recovery After Spine Surgery.
Article in JOR spine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Traditional assessments of functional recovery after spine surgery rely on patient-reported outcomes, which are prone to bias. Wearables and smartphone activity tracking offer objective monitoring but may be unreliable if devices are not carried continuously. Capacity-oriented measures, such as the 1-min walk test (1MWT) and 6-min walk test (6MWT), may be more reliable. This study evaluated smartphone-derived interval metrics after lumbar spine surgery retrospectively. Methods: iPhone Health exports from 41 patients were analyzed. A sliding-window algorithm parsed daily distances to simulate 1MWT and 6MWT. Step counts and active time were extracted. Activity was compared across four intervals: 6-month baseline, final 2 weeks preoperatively, early postoperative (0-2 weeks), and late postoperative (2-6 weeks). Paired Results: Median 1MWT fell from 98 m at baseline to 82 m in the final two preoperative weeks ( Conclusions: Smartphone-derived 1MWT and 6MWT improved significantly from the immediate preoperative period to late postoperative recovery, showed lower day-to-day variability than longitudinal activity metrics, and were strongly correlated with each other. These findings support smartphone-derived interval metrics as a feasible method to monitor recovery following lumbar spine surgery.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.