Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42022415›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

Rethinking the occurrence of volunteering from the capability-opportunity-motivation perspective.

Yijing Huang, Zhanni Luo, Kangzhou Peng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yijing HuangSchool of Foreign Languages and Literatures, Chongqing Normal University, Chongqing, China.
Zhanni LuoSchool of Foreign Languages and Literatures, Chongqing Normal University, Chongqing, China.
Kangzhou PengSchool of Foreign Languages and Literatures, Chongqing Normal University, Chongqing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COM-B model, proposed by Michie and colleagues, posits that capability (C), opportunity (O), and motivation (M) interact to generate behavior (B), offering a comprehensive framework for analyzing the conditions under which behavior occurs. While the COM-B model has been predominantly applied to health behavior interventions, we propose that it holds considerable potential for extension to positive behaviors such as volunteering. We introduce the COM-B framework to reconceptualize the occurrence of volunteering behavior, using university student volunteering as an illustrative case. We delineate the specific meanings of Capability, Opportunity, and Motivation within the volunteering context and explore conditions that enable volunteering as a behavior to occur. Regarding the Capability component, we distinguish between physical and psychological capability, emphasizing the central role of the latter for university student volunteering; Regarding opportunity, we differentiate physical opportunity from social opportunity and underscore the importance of perceived opportunity availability; Regarding the Motivation component, we integrate reflective and automatic motivation, proposing "wanting" as the critical mechanism that bridges the intention-behavior gap. We aim to provide a more comprehensive analysis of the conditions that generate volunteering behavior from the perspective of Capability, Opportunity and Motivation.

Indexed as

behavioral change wheel (BCW)behavior changeCOM-Bvolunteeringvolunteer motivation

Identifiers

PMID42022415
PMCPMC13095582

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.