Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42022410›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

The effects of responsiveness, perceived warmth, and anthropomorphism on university students' use of conversational AI for learning support: a chain mediation analysis based on S-O-R framework.

Yanling Lan, Sihang Liu, Hao Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yanling Lan *School of Film Television and Communication, Xiamen University of Technology, Xiamen, China.
Sihang Liu *School of Film Television and Communication, Xiamen University of Technology, Xiamen, China.
Hao ChenSchool of Film Television and Communication, Xiamen University of Technology, Xiamen, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Conversational artificial intelligence (C-AI) is increasingly used by university students for learning support, yet the mechanisms through which its affective attributes shape adoption behaviors remain insufficiently understood. Drawing on the Stimulus-Organism-Response (S-O-R) framework, this study examines how AI responsiveness, anthropomorphism, and perceived warmth influence students' adoption of C-AI through AI attachment and AI trust. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 538 Chinese university students. The proposed model tested the relationships among AI responsiveness, anthropomorphism, perceived warmth, AI attachment, AI trust, and adoption-related learning behaviors. Results: The results showed that AI responsiveness and anthropomorphism significantly strengthened students' AI attachment and AI trust, which in turn promoted their adoption of C-AI for learning support. Perceived warmth also facilitated sustained interaction and learning engagement through attachment and trust. Overall, AI attachment and AI trust served as key mediating mechanisms linking affective AI attributes to students' learning behaviors. Discussion: The findings suggest that university students' adoption of C-AI is shaped not only by technological functionality but also by emotional and relational cues embedded in AI interaction. This study extends the S-O-R framework in the context of educational AI and offers practical implications for designing human-centered, emotionally responsive, and pedagogically effective intelligent learning systems.

Indexed as

AI anthropomorphismconversational artificial intelligencehuman- AI interactionlearning supportStimulus-Organism-Response framework

Identifiers

PMID42022410
PMCPMC13096099

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.