ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2026
Estimating the economic burden of mastitis and antimicrobial use in a commercial dairy system using the animal health loss envelope framework.
Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Epigenetic and Epitranscriptomic Regulation of Mastitis in Dairy Cattle: A Review.Veterinary sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Mastitis is one of the most economically important diseases affecting dairy production systems, generating substantial losses through reduced milk production, treatment costs, and premature animal removal. However, farm-level economic assessments based on longitudinal management data remain limited in many low- and middle-income countries. Methods: This study applied the Animal Health Loss Envelope (AHLE) framework to estimate the economic impact of mastitis using four years (2022-2025) of routinely collected data from a large commercial dairy farm in Zambia. Farm records were analyzed to quantify disease occurrence, treatment outcomes, antimicrobial use, production losses, and health-related expenditures associated with mastitis management. Results: The herd recorded an average of 768 clinical mastitis cases annually among approximately 1,809 lactating cows, corresponding to an average incidence of 42.46%. Although recovery rates were high (95.1%), mastitis resulted in substantial productivity losses through discarded milk, mortality, and mastitis-related culling. Economic impacts were driven by both direct expenditures on treatment and preventive interventions, including antimicrobial therapies, diagnostics, hygiene measures, and vaccination, as well as indirect losses associated with reduced marketable milk and animal removal. Antimicrobial use intensity (AMUI) showed temporal variation across production periods, with higher AMUI values observed during months with increased mastitis incidence. Annual antimicrobial expenditure exceeded ZMW 834,833.00 (USD 34,784.70) while AMR-related diagnostics and mitigation investments (vaccination, disinfectants, biosecurity) exceeded ZMW 2,977,667.00 (USD 193,638.80). Mastitis caused large indirect losses through discarded milk (up to 234,445.25 L/year) and delayed reproduction (395-day calving interval). The final estimated loss of ZMW 6,786,211.88 (USD 282,758.83) resulted from the combined effects of direct disease management costs and indirect productivity losses observed per year. Conclusion: The results illustrate how mastitis and treatment-refractory infections contribute significantly to the Animal Health Loss Envelope (AHLE) and provide foundational data for future Productivity-adjusted-life-years (PALYs) estimations and cost-effectiveness analyses of AMR mitigation strategies. Our study demonstrates the practical applicability of the GBADs AHLE framework in real-world dairy systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.