ArticleVeterinary and animal science2026
Investigating attributes for selecting nurse sows in swine herds of Minnesota, USA, using Best-Worst Scaling analysis.
Article in Veterinary and animal science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nurse sow selection is aimed at ensuring ideal sows are chosen to manage surplus piglets in hyper prolific herds. This study investigated attributes farm managers preferred when choosing nurse sows. We evaluated seven attributes: Body Condition Score (BCS), Sows' Current Litter Size (SCLS), Sows' Current Litter Health (SCLH), Sow Behaviour (SB), Sow Teat Number (STN), Lactation Stage (LS), and Parity (P). Choice decisions of 51 managers were stratified into five subgroups: gender, age, pig-farming experience, education level, and herd size managed. We used Best Worst Scaling analysis to evaluate relative importance of attributes, while Conditional Logit Model assessed their utility importance, setting P as the baseline. Results showed that SCLH was the most important while P the least important. All six attributes were significantly preferred over the baseline. Female managers showed significant preferences for all attributes than male managers. Younger managers (18-40 years old) placed significant preference on sow physical qualities compared to older managers (> 40 years old). Managers with ≤10 years' experience demonstrated wider significant preference profiles than those of >10 years. Managers with college degree preferred half of the attributes while those with professional degrees (BSc/MSc) gave significant relevance to almost all attributes. Managers managing herds of up to 5000 sows viewed all attributes significant while those in charge of extra-large herds (>5000 sows) gave no preference to SB and LS. This research provides new empirical evidence and nuanced analysis of nurse sow selection, placing SCLH as a priority proxy for selecting a nurse sow.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.