Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42022358›Full record

ArticleVeterinary and animal science2026

Investigating attributes for selecting nurse sows in swine herds of Minnesota, USA, using Best-Worst Scaling analysis.

Joab Malanda Osotsi, Renata Knop, Samira Chatila, Pedro Urriola, Peter Balogh, Gabriella-Novotni-Danko

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary and animal science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Joab Malanda OsotsiDepartment of Animal Science, Institute of Animal Science, Biotechnology and Natural Conservation, Faculty of Agricultural and Food Sciences and Environmental Management, University of Debrecen, Boszormenyi Street 138, 4032 Debrecen, Hungary.
Renata KnopDepartment of Animal Science, Institute of Animal Science, Biotechnology and Natural Conservation, Faculty of Agricultural and Food Sciences and Environmental Management, University of Debrecen, Boszormenyi Street 138, 4032 Debrecen, Hungary.
Samira ChatilaCollege of Food, Agricultural and Natural Resource Sciences, University of Minnesota Twin Cities, St Paul MN 55108, United States.
Pedro UrriolaCollege of Food, Agricultural and Natural Resource Sciences, University of Minnesota Twin Cities, St Paul MN 55108, United States.
Peter BaloghFaculty of Economics and Business, University of Debrecen, Boszormenyi Street 138, 4032 Debrecen, Hungary.
Gabriella-Novotni-DankoDepartment of Animal Science, Institute of Animal Science, Biotechnology and Natural Conservation, Faculty of Agricultural and Food Sciences and Environmental Management, University of Debrecen, Boszormenyi Street 138, 4032 Debrecen, Hungary.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nurse sow selection is aimed at ensuring ideal sows are chosen to manage surplus piglets in hyper prolific herds. This study investigated attributes farm managers preferred when choosing nurse sows. We evaluated seven attributes: Body Condition Score (BCS), Sows' Current Litter Size (SCLS), Sows' Current Litter Health (SCLH), Sow Behaviour (SB), Sow Teat Number (STN), Lactation Stage (LS), and Parity (P). Choice decisions of 51 managers were stratified into five subgroups: gender, age, pig-farming experience, education level, and herd size managed. We used Best Worst Scaling analysis to evaluate relative importance of attributes, while Conditional Logit Model assessed their utility importance, setting P as the baseline. Results showed that SCLH was the most important while P the least important. All six attributes were significantly preferred over the baseline. Female managers showed significant preferences for all attributes than male managers. Younger managers (18-40 years old) placed significant preference on sow physical qualities compared to older managers (> 40 years old). Managers with ≤10 years' experience demonstrated wider significant preference profiles than those of >10 years. Managers with college degree preferred half of the attributes while those with professional degrees (BSc/MSc) gave significant relevance to almost all attributes. Managers managing herds of up to 5000 sows viewed all attributes significant while those in charge of extra-large herds (>5000 sows) gave no preference to SB and LS. This research provides new empirical evidence and nuanced analysis of nurse sow selection, placing SCLH as a priority proxy for selecting a nurse sow.

Indexed as

Conditional Logit ModelDiscrete choice experimentLarge littersManagers preferencesNurse sow selection

Identifiers

PMID42022358
PMCPMC13098455

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.