ArticlePrecision radiation oncology2026
Sodium glycididazole combined with definitive chemoradiotherapy for patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A multicenter randomized clinical trial.
Article in Precision radiation oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02721563 (A Perspective Random Trial of Sodium Glycididazole Combined With Definitive Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Squamous Cell Esophageal Carcinoma), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Perspective Random Trial of Sodium Glycididazole Combined With Definitive Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Squamous Cell Esophageal Carcinoma
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the radiosensitizer-sodium glycididazole (CMNa) combined with definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) versus CCRT alone in patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Methods: Patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive CMNa plus CCRT (CMNa group) or CCRT alone (control group). CMNa (800 mg/m Results: Sixty-six patients with ESCC were recruited from six medical centers between 2016 and 2018. The ORRs in the CMNa and control groups were 90.32% and 68.57%, respectively ( Conclusion: CMNa combined with CCRT improved the ORR in patients with ESCC compared with CCRT alone without increasing treatment-related toxicity. Trial Registration: The protocol was registered at Clinicaltrials.gov (www.clinicaltrials.gov) (Clinical Trials ID: NCT02721563). Study Registration Date: March 29, 2016.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.