Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42022326›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026

A comparative analysis of safety and short-term efficacy between open and laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy utilizing different drainage techniques.

Changjun Liu, Chen Zou, Pengxiang Tang, Hanyu Liu, Weinan Liu, Lian Shen, Kang Chen, Wei Cheng, Bingzhang Tian, Shuo Qi and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Changjun Liu *Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Hunan Provincial People's Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Hunan Normal University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Chen Zou *Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Hunan Provincial People's Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Hunan Normal University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Pengxiang Tang *Department of general surgery, People's Hospital of Yiyang, Yiyang, Hunan, China.
Hanyu LiuShi Cheng College, Hunan Normal University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Weinan LiuDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Hunan Provincial People's Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Hunan Normal University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Lian ShenDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Hunan Provincial People's Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Hunan Normal University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Kang ChenDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Hunan Provincial People's Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Hunan Normal University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Wei ChengDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Hunan Provincial People's Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Hunan Normal University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Bingzhang TianDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Hunan Provincial People's Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Hunan Normal University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Shuo QiDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Hunan Provincial People's Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Hunan Normal University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Bowen XieDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Loudi Central Hospital of Hunan Province, Loudi, Hunan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the safety profiles of open pancreaticoduodenectomy (OPD) and laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD), and to analyze the respective advantages and disadvantages of various internal and external drainage techniques. Methods: All 260 patients successfully underwent laparoscopic or open PD. They were divided into laparoscopy and laparotomy groups by surgical approach, and into internal and external drainage groups by drainage method. Four subgroups were then formed: minimally invasive surgical internal drainage (MIS-ID) and minimally invasive surgical external drainage (MIS-ED), open surgical internal surgical drainage (OS-ID) and open surgical external drainage (OS-ED). Perioperative outcomes were compared across all groups and subgroups. Results: No significant differences were observed between the laparoscopy and laparotomy groups in patient characteristics ( Conclusion: LPD can be performed safely and effectively without increasing postoperative complications compared to OPD. During LPD, the choice between internal and external drainage does not significantly influence outcomes following PD. Overall, LPD represents a safe and effective surgical approach, demonstrating significant potential for widespread adoption and clinical application.

Indexed as

clinical efficacyexternal drainageinternal drainageopen versus laparoscopicpancreaticoduodenectomy (PD)

Identifiers

PMID42022326
PMCPMC13095555

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.