ReviewLaryngoscope investigative otolaryngology2026
Decoding the OR Black Box and Similar Technologies and Considerations in Otolaryngologic Surgery.
Review in Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To introduce the concept and provide a unifying framework for multimodal intraoperative data-capturing technologies and to describe their role in otolaryngology. Methods: This narrative review synthesizes the current evidence and developments on intraoperative data-gathering technologies. It introduces the framework of Multimodal Operating-room Data Acquisition and Leveraging (MODAL) systems, which integrate data from surgical equipment, physiologic monitors, electronic health records, and ambient audiovisual sources. Results: Emerging multimodal data-capturing technologies are now enabling systematic collection and analysis of OR data to improve safety, quality, and efficiency in surgery. Otolaryngology is particularly well suited to adopt MODAL systems, given its large volume of video-based procedures such as endoscopic sinus surgery, most forms of ear surgery, airway surgery, and transoral robotic surgery. MODAL technologies have demonstrated value in intraoperative checklist compliance, surgical education, and postoperative safety analysis. There is also growing potential for real-time decision support through computer vision and artificial intelligence integration. Despite the growing adoption of these technologies, the terminology, implementation methods, and governance frameworks are not well standardized. The implementation of MODAL systems also requires attention to patient and physician privacy, data governance, technical infrastructure, and collaboration among providers, informaticists, and institutional leaders. Conclusion: While the current scope of MODAL systems is limited, their capabilities are evolving. Within otolaryngology, these technologies hold the most promise for video-intensive subspecialties. However, realizing their full benefits will require carefully planned institutional policy, governance, and continued refinement. Level of Evidence: 5.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.