ArticleFrontiers in reproductive health2026
Effects of different seasons on the outcome of
Article in Frontiers in reproductive health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: We aimed to investigate the effect of seasons on embryo quality and pregnancy outcomes among infertile patients undergoing Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data from 1,413 infertile patients who received IVF and antagonist ovulation induction program in the Reproductive Medicine Center of our hospital from January 2019 to December 2023. Based on seasons, they were divided into the spring group, summer group, autumn group, and winter group. The general information, embryo status, and pregnancy outcome of patients in different groups were compared. Results: There were no significant differences in general data, embryo quality, and pregnancy outcomes among the four groups ( Conclusion: For infertile patients undergoing controlled ovarian stimulation with an antagonist protocol, the rate of blastocyst formation in the spring was higher than that in the summer. There might be a potential interaction between the year and the season.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.