Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42022238›Full record

ArticleSensors & diagnostics2024

Comparison of voltammetric methods used in the interrogation of electrochemical aptamer-based sensors.

Elsi Verrinder, Kaylyn K Leung, Murat Kaan Erdal, Lior Sepunaru, Kevin W Plaxco

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors & diagnostics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Elsi VerrinderDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California 93106, USA.
Kaylyn K LeungDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California 93106, USA.
Murat Kaan ErdalDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA.
Lior SepunaruDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California 93106, USA.
Kevin W PlaxcoDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California 93106, USA.

Funding

Bio-electrochemical detectors for in vivo continuous monitoringR01EB022015 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BARBARA · PI KIPPIN, TOD EDWARD, PLAXCO, KEVIN W · 2017 to 2025
$4.6M
Comprehensive, Real-Time Monitoring of the Accumulation and Clearance of Small Molecules in Kidney DiseaseR01DK137421 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BARBARA · PI Tod Edward Kippin · 2024 to 2026
$2.0M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB022015NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK137421
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electrochemical aptamer-based (EAB) sensors are the first continuous molecular measurement technology that is both (1) able to function in situ in the living body and (2) independent of the chemical reactivity of its targets, rendering it generalizable to a wide range of analytes. Comprised of an electrode-bound, redox-reporter-modified aptamer, signal generation in EAB sensors arises when binding to this target-recognizing aptamer causes a conformation change that, in turn, alters the rate of electron transfer to and from the redox reporter to the electrode surface. A range of electrochemical approaches, including both voltammetric (e.g., cyclic, square wave, and alternating current voltammetry) and non-voltammetric (e.g., chronoamperometry, electrochemical phase interrogation) methods have been used to monitor this change in transfer rate, with square wave voltammetry having dominated recent reports. To date, however, the literature has seen few direct comparisons of the performance of these various approaches. In response we describe here comparisons of EAB sensors interrogated using square wave, differential pulse, and alternating current voltammetry. We find that, while the noise associated with AC voltammetry (in vitro in 37°C whole blood) is exceptionally low, neither this approach nor differential pulse voltammetry support accurate drift correction under these same conditions, suggesting that neither approach is suitable for deployment in vivo. Square wave voltammetry, in contrast, matches or surpasses the gain achieved by the other two approaches, achieves good signal-to-noise, and supports high-accuracy drift correction in 37°C whole blood. Taken together, these results finally confirm that square wave voltammetry is the preferred pulsed voltammetric method for interrogating EAB sensors in complex biological fluids.

Identifiers

PMID42022238
PMCPMC13099078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.