Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42022207›Full record

ArticleJournal of hand surgery global online2026

Long-term Grip Strength and Complications After Total Wrist Fusion With and Without Inclusion of the Third Carpometacarpal Joint: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Matthew Lawson-Smith, Simon Parker, Annora Kumar, Chris Roberts, Gregory Bain

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of hand surgery global online, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Matthew Lawson-SmithDepartment of Hand Surgery, Fremantle Hospital, Alma Street, Fremantle, Western Australia, Australia.
Simon ParkerDepartment of Hand Surgery, Fremantle Hospital, Alma Street, Fremantle, Western Australia, Australia.
Annora KumarDepartment of Hand Surgery, Fremantle Hospital, Alma Street, Fremantle, Western Australia, Australia.
Chris RobertsAustralian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
Gregory BainDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Flinders Medical Centre and Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Total wrist fusion (TWF) is a reliable surgical procedure for wrist arthritis. Options include: arthrodesis of the third carpometacarpal (CMC) joints (third CMC joint fusion); bridging the third CMC joint without fusion (third CMC joint bridging); or using a nonspanning plate (third CMC joint sparing). The review aimed to evaluate and compare these techniques regarding grip strength and complications. Methods: A systematic review searched MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus databases. Observational studies and randomized controlled trials investigating dorsal plate TWF were included. Meta-analysis was conducted using Stata (version 18). Grip strength was defined as long-term (12+ months) postoperative kilogram force in the operative hand expressed as percentage of contralateral hand and analyzed using a random-effects meta-analysis. The Freeman-Tukey transformation was applied to stabilize the estimates of variance, and complications were analyzed using a random-effects meta-analysis of single proportions. Subgroup analysis was performed for early/intermediate (0-30 months) and delayed (30+ months) follow up. Results: Sixteen studies were identified, including 786 wrists. Mean follow up was 5.4 years. Only six studies reported grip strength as an outcome measure. To permit statistical analysis, the third CMC joint fusion and third CMC joint bridging groups were combined (termed third CMC joint spanning) and compared against the third CMC joint sparing group, revealing no significant difference in mean grip strength (74% vs 64%). Between 0 and 30 months, there was no statistically significant difference in complication rate (third CMC joint fusion = 24%, third CMC joint bridging = 16%, and third CMC joint sparing = 14%). Beyond 30 months, there was a higher rate of complications in the third CMC joint bridging group than in the third CMC joint fusion group (50% vs 20%). Longer-term follow-up data were not available in the third CMC joint sparing group. There was no significant difference in the union rates between groups (96% to 97%). Conclusions: There is a higher rate of complications with a third CMC joint bridging technique than the third CMC joint fusion technique. Early outcomes of third CMC joint sparing techniques appear equivalent but longer-term data are still required. Type of study/level of evidence: Therapeutic I.

Indexed as

Carpometacarpal jointComplicationsGrip strengthTotal wrist arthrodesisTotal wrist fusion

Identifiers

PMID42022207
PMCPMC13098577

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.