ArticleIJU case reports2026
Successful Preservation of the Penis After en Bloc Resection of Locally Recurrent Rectal Cancer Involving the Left Crus of the Corpus Cavernosum and Corpus Spongiosum.
Article in IJU case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: We report a case of locally recurrent rectal cancer involving the penile base successfully treated with penis-preserving salvage surgery. Case Presentation: A 63-year-old man underwent abdominoperineal resection for locally advanced rectal cancer, followed by three metastasectomies for inguinal lymph node recurrences and a pulmonary metastasis. Thirty-four months later, intrapelvic recurrences involving the seminal vesicle, prostate, left crus of corpus cavernosum penis (CCP), and corpus spongiosum (CS) developed. Following chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy, cystoprostatectomy with en bloc resection of the left proximal CCP and proximal CS was performed while preserving the right crus of CCP where the internal pudendal artery (IPA) ran. Surgical margins were negative. No intrapelvic recurrence had developed until his decease from pulmonary metastasis in postoperative month 23. Conclusion: The penis can be preserved even after the unilateral crus of the CCP and the proximal CS are partially resected when the contralateral IPA blood flow is viable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.