ReviewPatient preference and adherence2026
Evidence-Based Contraceptive Guidance for Young Women Following Induced Abortion: A Systematic Summary.
Review in Patient preference and adherence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To summarize the best available evidence on post-abortion contraceptive counseling for young women (aged 15-24 years) and provide an evidence-based basis for clinical practice. Methods: Following the "6S" model, we systematically searched international and Chinese guide websites, professional association websites, and databases in both Chinese and English, from inception to June 2025. The types of literature included clinical decisions, evidence summaries, guidelines, and expert consensus. Two researchers independently performed literature screening, data extraction, and quality assessment. Guidelines were assessed by AGREE II, systematic reviews by AMSTAR 2.0, and RCTs and expert consensus by JBI critical appraisal tools. Evidence was graded using the JBI Evidence Grading System (2014) and synthesized by topic. Results: Fifteen articles were included the following: 3 clinical decision aids, 7 guidelines, 2 expert consensus statements, 2 systematic reviews, and 1 RCT. Thirty-three pieces of evidence were summarized across seven categories: provision of contraceptive services, timing of initiation, assessment and counseling, values clarification, complications and management, follow-up, and support. Conclusion: This summary provides contraceptive guidance for young women after induced abortion. Healthcare providers should integrate local policies and personal preferences, follow patient-centered principles, and translate this evidence into practice to increase uptake of efficient contraceptive methods and reduce unintended pregnancies among young women. Systematic Review Registration: Fudan University Center for Evidence-Based Nursing (Registration No. ES20257666).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.