ArticleCommunications earth & environment2026
Giant iceberg behaviour impacts regional biogeochemical cycling in the Southern Ocean.
Article in Communications earth & environment, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Giant Antarctic iceberg calving is projected to increase with climate change, affecting ocean circulation, nutrient supply, and carbon cycling. These icebergs can stimulate primary production and influence Southern Ocean carbon fluxes through modification of upper ocean physics and biogeochemistry, yet the underlying mechanisms remain poorly constrained. We investigate the coupled effects of meltwater input and nutrient dynamics around two of the largest known icebergs, A-76A and A-23A, using silicon isotopes alongside hydrographic, meltwater, and macronutrient observations to examine nutrient cycling. Around A-76A, enhanced glacial meltwater input coincides with macronutrient variability and strong silicon isotope fractionation, indicating diatom utilisation sustained by continued macronutrient supply. In contrast, waters around A-23A show minimal glacial meltwater enhancement and remain macronutrient-rich, with no silicon isotope fractionation, indicating limited biological uptake despite favourable background conditions. These contrasting regimes reveal that iceberg influence on ocean biogeochemistry is highly heterogeneous, reflecting the combined effects of micronutrient fertilisation, macronutrient resupply, and environmental context. Our findings demonstrate that giant icebergs exert dual controls on productivity by initiating blooms through micronutrient delivery and sustaining biomass accumulation through resupply from depth. This mechanistic understanding is critical for assessing the role of increasing iceberg discharge in future Southern Ocean productivity and carbon cycling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.