ArticleOpen access emergency medicine : OAEM2026
Limits of Transfusion Burden as a Predictor of Mortality in Severely Injured Trauma Patients.
Article in Open access emergency medicine : OAEM, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Severe hemorrhage remains a leading cause of early and preventable mortality in trauma patients. While massive transfusion protocols (MTPs) have improved resuscitation strategies, the prognostic value of transfusion burden alone remains unclear. This study evaluated the reliability of total blood product and blood cooler issuance as predictors of mortality in trauma MTP and assessed the added prognostic value of early laboratory parameters, neurological status on arrival and injury severity scores. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adult trauma patients requiring MTP activation upon arrival to a Level I trauma center between January 2023 and May 2025. Demographic, clinical, transfusion, and first laboratory data obtained within 15 to 30 minutes of presentation were analyzed. Blood cooler utilization was categorized as ≤5, 6-10, or >10 coolers. Outcomes were defined as survival or death at the conclusion of MTP. Results: A total of 135 patients were included; 36 (26.7%) expired during MTP activation. Non-survivors received significantly greater numbers of red blood cells, plasma, and total blood products requiring higher numbers of blood coolers. They also demonstrated more severe coagulopathy, higher lactate levels, greater metabolic derangement, lower platelet counts, hypothermia, lower Glasgow Coma Scale scores, and higher injury severity. Kaplan Meier and Cox regression analyses showed no statistically significant association between cooler category and survival. A transfusion threshold of ≥36 total blood units yielded modest predictive performance (accuracy 69.6%) using Youden's index. Integration of laboratory markers significantly improved mortality prediction models (AUC from 0.62 to 0.78). Conclusion: In trauma patients requiring MTP activation, mortality was driven primarily by injury severity, neurologic status, and early physiologic derangements. Blood product utilization demonstrated limited prognostic value in isolation but contributed meaningfully when combined with laboratory and clinical parameters. Blood cooler notifications may serve as useful adjuncts to prompt timely clinical reassessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.