ArticleSaudi journal of anaesthesia
Comparison of the analgesic efficacy of erector spinae plane block, serratus anterior plane block, and serratus posterior superior ıntercostal plane block on postoperative pain in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery.
Article in Saudi journal of anaesthesia. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to compare erector spinae plane block (ESPB), serratus anterior plane block (SAPB), and serratus posterior superior intercostal plane block (SPSIPB) to determine the most suitable technique for maintaining postoperative analgesia in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgeries (VATS). Materials and Methods: Forty-five adult patients scheduled for elective VATS were included. Patients were randomly allocated into three groups: ESPB, SAPB, and SPSIPB. All patients received postoperative paracetamol and dexketoprofen, and intravenous tramadol hydrochloride. Postoperative static and dynamic visual analogue scale (VAS) scores, total tramadol consumption, side effects were recorded at regular intervals. Results: Static VAS scores at 0, 1, 6, 12, and 18 hours were significantly higher in the ESPB group than in the SAPB and SPSIPB groups ( Conclusion: In patients undergoing VATS, SAPB was associated with lower VAS scores compared to both ESPB and SPSIPB, while ESPB resulted in higher VAS scores and greater tramadol consumption than the other two groups. These findings suggest that SAPB may be a more effective analgesic technique following thoracoscopic surgery, though confirmation with larger patient populations is recommended.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.