ArticleSaudi journal of anaesthesia
Enhanced recovery after surgery from 1990 to 2024: A bibliometric and visual analysis.
Article in Saudi journal of anaesthesia. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to analyze publications from 1990 to 2024 to examine the relationship of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) with countries, institutions, authors, journals, references, and keywords. Methods: We searched for ERAS-related publications between 1990 and 2024 in the Web of Science Core Collection (WOSCC) database. The strategy included the following search terms: "TS=ERAS" OR "enhanced recovery" OR "enhanced recovery after surgery" OR "enhanced recovery after surgery eras" OR "enhanced recovery program" OR "enhanced recovery protocol" OR "eras protocol" OR "eras r" OR "fast track" OR "fast track surgery" OR "fast-track" OR "fast-track surgery." The search was restricted to articles and reviews in all languages. All results were filtered using these criteria on WOSCC and exported as a plain text file. Visual analyses were performed using Microsoft Word and VOS viewer 1.6.20. Results: A total of 4,275 publications and 111,922 citations were identified. Overall, 101 countries contributed to ERAS research, with the United States ranking first. The institution with the highest number of publications was Harvard University. Nicolas Demartines ranked first with 51 publications, while H. Kehlet was the most frequently cited author. Among the journals publishing on ERAS, Transplantation had the highest number of publications. The most cited source was Enhanced Recovery After Surgery: A Review. Keyword analysis revealed that "enhanced recovery after surgery" was the primary research focus within the existing literature. Conclusions: The findings of this study demonstrate that, particularly since 2008, there has been a steadily growing interest in ERAS worldwide.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.