Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42022067›Full record

ReviewSaudi journal of anaesthesia

Anesthetic considerations in smokers: A scoping review.

Ahad N Yamani, Abdulrahman Almazrooa

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Saudi journal of anaesthesia. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ahad N YamaniDepartment of Surgery, Anesthesia Section, Faculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Rabigh, Saudi Arabia.
Abdulrahman AlmazrooaDepartment of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Faculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tobacco smoking is a well-established modifiable risk factor that significantly influences perioperative outcomes through complex physiological and pharmacological mechanisms. Despite widespread awareness of its long-term health consequences, a considerable proportion of surgical patients continue to smoke at the time of their procedures. The objective of this review is to synthesize current evidence regarding the impact of smoking on anesthetic management. Smoking induces chronic inflammation and structural changes in the respiratory tract, which may increase the risk of intraoperative hypoxemia, bronchospasm, and postoperative pulmonary complications. Cardiovascular risks are similarly elevated due to smoking-related endothelial dysfunction, increased sympathetic activity, and impaired myocardial oxygen balance. Moreover, nicotine and other components of tobacco smoke alter drug metabolism, particularly via hepatic enzyme induction, affecting the pharmacokinetics of commonly used anesthetics and analgesics. Smokers also exhibit altered pain perception and increased opioid requirements postoperatively, complicating analgesic strategies. In conclusion, an in-depth understanding of the multifaceted effects of smoking on anesthetic care is essential for optimizing outcomes and reducing perioperative morbidity in this high-risk group.

Indexed as

Anesthesiaopiatessmokingsurgical operations

Identifiers

PMID42022067
PMCPMC13099040

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.