ArticleOphthalmology science2026
Fundus Autofluorescence as a Sensitive Biomarker of Disease Progression in Bietti Crystalline Dystrophy.
Article in Ophthalmology science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To characterize the natural history of Bietti crystalline dystrophy (BCD) and to identify reliable outcome measures for detecting disease progression. Design: A multicenter, prospective observational study. Participants: Patients with genetically confirmed BCD carrying biallelic pathogenic Methods: Multimodal imaging and functional assessments included BCVA, static perimetry (Humphrey 10-2), fundus autofluorescence, and OCT. Main Outcome Measures: Longitudinal changes in BCVA; hypo-autofluorescent (hypo-AF) area; and static perimetry parameters, such as mean deviation (MD), absolute scotoma points (ASPs), transitional zone retinal sensitivity (TZRS), and central subfield thickness (CST). Results: Thirteen patients with genetically confirmed BCD were followed prospectively over a median of 2.5 years (range: 2.5-3 years). Longitudinal analysis showed progression in hypo-AF area (12.0 mm Conclusions: This prospective natural history study suggests that hypo-AF area may serve as a useful structural measure for detecting disease progression in BCD clinical trials, warranting further validation in larger prospective studies. Financial Disclosures: Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.