Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42022033›Full record

ArticlePhysical review research

Time heterogeneity of the Förster radius from dipole orientational dynamics impacts single-molecule Förster resonance energy transfer experiments.

David Frost, Keisha Cook, Hugo Sanabria

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physical review research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

David FrostSchool of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina 29634, USA.
Keisha CookSchool of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina 29634, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1172-0575
Hugo SanabriaDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina 29634, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7068-6827

Funding

Impact of pathogenic missense mutations on the ARID domain of ARID1aR15CA280699 · NCI · CLEMSON UNIVERSITY · PI SANABRIA, HUGO · 2023 to 2023
$443k
Targeting flagellar motility in the treatment of kinetoplastid diseasesR15AI137979 · NIAID · CLEMSON UNIVERSITY · PI SANABRIA, HUGO · 2019 to 2019
$437k
NCI NIH HHS R15 CA280699NIAID NIH HHS R15 AI137979
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) is a quantum mechanical process governing the nonradiative energy transfer between coupled electric dipoles. Its strong distance dependence makes it a widely used as a "molecular ruler" in biology, chemistry, and physics. In single-molecule FRET (smFRET) experiments employing time-resolved confocal microscopy, deviations from the theoretical Förster relationship between FRET efficiency and donor fluorescence lifetime-termed dynamic shifts-provide insight into underlying molecular conformational dynamics. A key challenge in interpreting these shifts is disentangling contributions from the intrinsic motion of the fluorescent dyes from those of the biomolecular system under study. We present a novel theoretical framework based on Langevin dynamics to model the stochastic translational and rotational motion of dye linkers, incorporating first-principles physics and chemical constraints consistent with molecular dynamics simulations. Our results demonstrate that the dominant factor influencing dynamic shifts in smFRET is the relative orientational fluctuations of the dyes' electric dipole moments, rather than their accessible spatial volumes. These findings refine the theoretical foundations of FRET and provide the most precise estimates of FRET efficiency to date, enhancing its utility as a molecular-scale probe of dynamic processes.

Identifiers

PMID42022033
PMCPMC13098721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.