Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42022027›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in physiology2026

Integration of neutrophil to high-density lipoprotein ratio for prognostic assessment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a large-scale long-term retrospective study.

Nan-Jun Chen, Xu-Xin Lin, Rui-Xin Cheng, Ao-Qiang Chen, Yong-Miao Lin, Zhi-Qing Long, Fang-Fang Duan, Xin Huang, Wen Xia, De-Huan Xie and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Nan-Jun Chen *Department of Radiation Oncology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Xu-Xin Lin *School of Medicine South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China.
Rui-Xin Cheng *Department of Radiation Oncology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Ao-Qiang ChenSun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Guangzhou, China.
Yong-Miao LinSun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Guangzhou, China.
Zhi-Qing LongSun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Guangzhou, China.
Fang-Fang DuanSun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Guangzhou, China.
Xin HuangSun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Guangzhou, China.
Wen XiaSun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Guangzhou, China.
De-Huan XieDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Yuan LeiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Sha-Sha Du *Department of Radiation Oncology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Chen Ren *Department of Radiation Oncology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Xin Hua *Department of Radiation Oncology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Recent research suggests that the emerging neutrophil to high-density lipoprotein ratio (NHR) has a significant correlation with the survival outcomes across a range of tumors. However, its prognostic value in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) remained to be elucidated. This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between NHR and overall survival (OS) in patients with NPC, as well as to develop a corresponding prognostic model. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 834 NPC patients who received platinum-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) between January 2010 and December 2014. The optimal NHR cutoff was determined using maximally selected rank statistics. Survival analyses were performed using Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox regression models. A prognostic nomogram incorporating NHR with conventional risk factors was developed and validated. Results: The NHR score successfully segregated NPC patients into two categories with significantly different OS (HR = 0.672, 95% CI: 0.481-0.939, P = 0.019). Multivariate analysis confirmed NHR as an independent prognostic factor, along with age, T stage, and N stage. Considering EBV-DNA is a well-established prognostic factor for NPC in accordance with clinical practice and previous studies, we incorporated it together with the above factors to construct the prognostic nomogram. The established nomogram showed modestly higher predictive accuracy (C-index = 0.696, 95% CI: 0.654-0.738) compared to conventional staging parameters (C-index = 0.648, 95% CI: 0.583-0.713). Conclusion: Pre-treatment NHR serves as an independent prognostic indicator for survival in NPC patients undergoing CCRT. This readily available, cost-effective biomarker, when integrated with traditional prognostic factors, provides a comprehensive tool for risk stratification and treatment planning. External validation through multicenter studies is warranted to confirm these findings.

Indexed as

concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT)nasopharyngeal carcinomaNHRoverall survival (OS)prognosis

Identifiers

PMID42022027
PMCPMC13095610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.