ArticleFrontiers in physiology2026
Patient-specific hemodynamic simulation for left ventricular assist device via non-invasive monitoring based on lumped parameter model and hierarchical neural network.
Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) are widely used in advanced heart failure, but require accurate hemodynamic assessment for optimal management. Current invasive methods such as right-heart catheterisation (RHC) are limited in routine use, highlighting the need for non-invasive alternatives. Methods: A non-invasive framework combining a lumped parameter model (LPM) with a hierarchical neural network (CLPM-Net) was developed to estimate patient-specific hemodynamic parameters from echocardiography and blood pressure. Model identifiability analysis was performed to select key parameters. The model was trained on synthetic data and validated with clinical cases. Results: The proposed method achieved accurate parameter estimation with errors below 10% (RMSE). Simulated hemodynamic indicators showed strong agreement with ground truth (nMED < 1%). Clinical validation demonstrated close consistency with invasive measurements. Discussion: This framework enables non-invasive, patient-specific hemodynamic assessment for LVAD management. It shows potential as an alternative to invasive monitoring, though further large-scale clinical validation is required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.