Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42022012›Full record

ArticleISME communications2026

An ANIr-based methodology to determine if two sequence-discrete populations are identical and identify cosmopolitan prokaryotic populations.

Roth E Conrad, Luis M Rodriguez-R, Blake G Lindner, Kenji Gerhardt, Konstantinos T Konstantinidis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ISME communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Roth E ConradOcean Science & Engineering, School of Biological Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, United States.
Luis M Rodriguez-RDepartment of Chemistry and Biosciences, Aalborg University, Aalborg 9220, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7603-3093
Blake G LindnerSchool of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, United States.
Kenji GerhardtCenter for Bioinformatics and Computational Genomics, School of Biological Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0644-1862
Konstantinos T KonstantinidisOcean Science & Engineering, School of Biological Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0954-4755

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although sequence-discrete species appear to dominate microbial communities, readily distinguishing between distinct populations of a species recovered from different short-read metagenomic samples is challenging due to technical limitations associated with read length. To close this gap, we developed a novel algorithm to evaluate which reads in a metagenome belong to a target population based on the distribution of sequence identities of reads aligned to a reference sequence, which are filtered using a Kernel density estimation (KDE) as a flexible alternative to the commonly used static 95% nucleotide identity cutoff. Subsequently, we employed the average nucleotide identity of reads (ANIr) aligning above the KDE threshold, and resampling techniques for estimating the confidence intervals of ANIr values, to quantify intrapopulation sequence diversity and compare populations across globally representative marine samples. Most populations showed high ANIr in only a few samples at similar depths and decreased ANIr and increased gene-content difference between samples where a closely related population is detected (e.g. same 95% ANI-based species). Accordingly, ANIr correlated with the physical distance between the samples, and only a few truly cosmopolitan populations were identified. Among the latter,

Indexed as

average nucleotide identitybiogeographydifferentiationintraspeciesmetagenomeread recruitmentspeciation

Identifiers

PMID42022012
PMCPMC13098170

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.