ArticleISME communications2026
An ANIr-based methodology to determine if two sequence-discrete populations are identical and identify cosmopolitan prokaryotic populations.
Article in ISME communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although sequence-discrete species appear to dominate microbial communities, readily distinguishing between distinct populations of a species recovered from different short-read metagenomic samples is challenging due to technical limitations associated with read length. To close this gap, we developed a novel algorithm to evaluate which reads in a metagenome belong to a target population based on the distribution of sequence identities of reads aligned to a reference sequence, which are filtered using a Kernel density estimation (KDE) as a flexible alternative to the commonly used static 95% nucleotide identity cutoff. Subsequently, we employed the average nucleotide identity of reads (ANIr) aligning above the KDE threshold, and resampling techniques for estimating the confidence intervals of ANIr values, to quantify intrapopulation sequence diversity and compare populations across globally representative marine samples. Most populations showed high ANIr in only a few samples at similar depths and decreased ANIr and increased gene-content difference between samples where a closely related population is detected (e.g. same 95% ANI-based species). Accordingly, ANIr correlated with the physical distance between the samples, and only a few truly cosmopolitan populations were identified. Among the latter,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.