ArticlePractical laboratory medicine2026
Short tandem repeat (STR) typing of a deceased individual with an extensive blood transfusion history: A case report.
Article in Practical laboratory medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Detecting donor DNA in blood samples after multiple allogeneic transfusions remains a persistent concern in forensic human identification, given the limited and variable data. Although some studies have reported no secondary DNA profiles, transfusion-associated microchimerism (TA-MC) has been observed in deceased individuals who received perimortem blood transfusions. In this case report, we present autosomal short tandem repeat (aSTR) findings for a deceased male who received four units of plasma-reduced RBCs within 24 hours and 25 units over a period of eight months before his death. Given this extensive blood transfusion history, there was concern that donor DNA might persist and interfere with obtaining a reliable aSTR profile for paternity testing. To address this, we analyzed buccal swabs, skin, and muscle tissue, in addition to blood samples. No secondary aSTR profile was detected in the blood, and all four sample types produced concordant DNA profiles. In this instance, results suggest that any donor DNA present was below the detection threshold for STR analysis using capillary electrophoresis (CE) but may be detectable with more sensitive genotyping assays such as next generation sequencing (NGS) or digital PCR. Detection is more likely after a recent massive pRBC transfusion, the use of non-leukoreduced blood, or transfusion in leukopenic recipients. Despite the complications associated with massive allogeneic blood transfusions, aSTR typing remains a robust and reliable method for forensic human identification, particularly when suitable sample types are selected and rigorous procedures are followed in cases involving transfused individuals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.