Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42021877›Full record

ArticleSichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition2026

[Screening of High-quality Spermatozoa Using Transwell Membrane Pores and Assessment of Their Performance].

Yunshi Li, Yongxiang Liu, Shuting Zhang, Xuekun Huang, Zhiwei Weng, Shaohu Zhou, Zhihui Liu, Ruiqi Li

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yunshi Li( 510405)The First Clinical Medical College, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510405, China.ORCID 0009-0006-2508-1101
Yongxiang Liu( 510405)The First Clinical Medical College, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510405, China.
Shuting Zhang( 510405)The First Clinical Medical College, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510405, China.
Xuekun Huang( 510405)The First Clinical Medical College, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510405, China.
Zhiwei Weng( 510405)The First Clinical Medical College, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510405, China.
Shaohu Zhou( 510405)The First Clinical Medical College, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510405, China.
Zhihui Liu( 510405)The First Clinical Medical College, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510405, China.ORCID 0009-0003-2425-5681
Ruiqi Li( 510405)The First Clinical Medical College, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510405, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0196-1965

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The feasibility of using Transwell, based on the molecular sieve effect of its membrane pores, to select high-quality human sperm was explored. Methods: A total of 162 fresh semen samples were collected from the Department of Andrology at the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine between November 2023 and May 2024. Differences in sperm selection using 5 μm and 8 μm pore Transwell filters were analyzed, and microscopic structural differences were observed by transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Changes in semen parameters after 30, 60, and 80 minutes of Transwell sperm selection were compared. Differences in semen parameters after optimization of sperm of varying qualities by Transwell, density gradient centrifugation (DGC), and swim-up (SU) methods were also compared. In this study, the percentage of progressive motility (PR) of sperm was set as the primary outcome measure, while sperm motility, normal sperm morphology rate (NSMR), DNA fragmentation index (DFI), sperm concentration, and recovery rate were set as secondary outcome measures. Results: When the aperture is 5 μm and the preferred time is 60 minutes, the Transwell method yields better results for sperm selection. In the normal semen group, compared with the DGC method, the median percentage of PR in sperm after Transwell selection increased from 77.50% to 92.05% ( Conclusion: The Transwell preferred method demonstrates excellent performance in obtaining sufficient sperm with high viability, good morphology, and good DNA integrity. This makes it a promising, simple, and practical method for selecting high-quality sperm in assisted reproductive technologies.

Indexed as

Cell SeparationSemen AnalysisSpermatozoaDNA FragmentationHumansMaleSperm MotilityAssisted reproductive technologyDNA fragmentationSpermatozoaSperm motilityTranswell

Identifiers

PMID42021877
PMCPMC13095707

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.