ArticleBJUI compass2026
Active migration technique in RIRS for 1- to 2-cm middle and upper ureteral stones in a prospective randomized controlled study.
Article in BJUI compass, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to observe the efficacy and safety of the active migration technique and in situ lithotripsy technique in retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for patients with 1- to 2-cm middle and upper ureteral stones. Patients and Methods: Two hundred seven patients were enrolled in the study, of which 103 included in the study group received active migration lithotripsy and 104 included in the control group received in situ lithotripsy. The primary study outcome was the stone-free rate (SFR) on the first postoperative day. Secondary outcomes included the total SFR 4 weeks postoperatively, operative time, reduction in the haemoglobin levels, the length of postoperative hospital stay, the incidence of ureteral stricture at 3-month postoperatively and any surgery-related complications. Results: There was no obvious difference between two groups in patients' demographics and preoperative clinical characteristics ( Conclusions: Our study provides evidence that the active migration technique, when combined with flexible and negative suction ureteral access sheath (FANS) in RIRS, results in a higher SFR and a lower complication rate than in situ lithotripsy for treating 1- to 2-cm middle and upper ureteral stones. The protocol for this study has been accepted by the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (The registration number: ChiCTR2200056402; Date of registration: 03-06-2022).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.