Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42021806›Full record

ArticleMedical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran2025

How Visible is the Sex Work in Iran?

Azam Rastegari, Mohammad Reza Baneshi, Nooshin Zarei, Hassan Joulaei, Mohammad Reza Heydari

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Azam RastegariModeling in Health Research Center, Institute for Futures Studies in Health, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.
Mohammad Reza BaneshiModeling in Health Research Center, Institute for Futures Studies in Health, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6405-8688
Nooshin ZareiHIV/AIDS Research Center, Institute of Health, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Hassan JoulaeiHealth Policy Research Center, Institute of Health, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Mohammad Reza HeydariHIV/AIDS Research Center, Institute of Health, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4124-6085

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Network Scale-Up (NSU) is a promising tool in the size estimation of stigmatized behaviors. In NSU, participants from the general population describe the frequency of stigmatized behaviors in their network. To avoid underestimation, due to the invisibility of sensitive behaviors, NSU results should be adjusted by the Visibility Factor (VF). This manuscript aims to compare three VF calculation methods in sex work settings: Game of Contact (GC), Social Respect (SR), and Expert Opinion (EO). Methods: In the GC method, we selected 20 names and asked 60 FSWs (Female Sex workers) (known as egos) the total number of their acquaintances (known as alters) with any of the 20 names, and of those, how many were aware that the ego was an FSW. In the SR method, we asked 600 participants from the general population about the number of FSWs they knew, and to rank their respect for FSWs on a scale of 1 to 5. Finally, we asked 14 experts in the field of HIV and health policy about the visibility rate of sex work in Iran. Results: Based on EO, VF was as low as 38%. VF in GC was 67% (95% CI: 54%, 80%) for both male and female alters. SR suggested a VF of 77% (58%, 101%), which was higher in male than female respondents (83% vs. 62%). Conclusion: Different methods provide different VF estimates. For a fair comparison of studies, a concrete and standard method for VF calculation should be applied.

Indexed as

Female Sex WorkerIranNetwork Scale UpVisibility

Identifiers

PMID42021806
PMCPMC13097197

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.