ArticleMedical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran2025
Translation and Cross-Cultural Adaptation of the 26-Item Cognitive Difficulties Scales in Persian-Speaking Elderly Population.
Article in Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cognitive impairment represents a significant global health challenge, necessitating early identification through reliable self-report questionnaires. The 26-item Cognitive Difficulties Scale (CDS-26) assesses subjective cognitive complaints but lacks validation in diverse linguistic contexts. In the present research, we systematically conducted the translation, cultural adaptation, and preliminary psychometric evaluation of the CDS-26 for the Persian-speaking elderly population in Iran. Methods: Utilizing a methodological, cross-sectional design, the CDS-26 was translated into Persian following the International Quality of Life Assessment (IQOLA) protocol, including forward/back translation, expert committee review, and pilot testing. Psychometric evaluation involved 138 community-dwelling elderly participants (age ≥60 years). Construct validity was investigated using confirmatory factor analysis. The reliability of the scale was determined by analyzing its internal consistency through Cronbach's alpha and evaluating temporal stability via the intraclass correlation coefficient in a subgroup of 30 participants. Results: Satisfactory face and content validity were confirmed (CVR ≥0.62, overall CVI = 0.89). Confirmatory Factor Analysis demonstrated excellent to good model fit (CFI = 0.977, RMSEA = 0.066, SRMR = 0.063), supporting the scale's multidimensional structure. The full scale exhibited excellent internal consistency (α=0.954) and test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.993). While age, gender, education, and marital status were not significant predictors, economic status was a crucial determinant: higher income groups reported significantly lower CDS scores (medium income: β=-7.97, Conclusion: The Persian CDS-26 is a valid, reliable, and culturally appropriate instrument for assessing subjective cognitive difficulties in Iranian elderly. This tool is valuable for early identification and monitoring cognitive health in clinical and community settings, highlighting the significant impact of socioeconomic factors on perceived cognitive function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.