ArticlePediatric emergency care2026
Managing and Communicating Diagnostic Uncertainty in Pediatric Emergency Care: National Insights and Opportunities for Intervention.
Article in Pediatric emergency care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Decisional conflict levels and associated factors among parents of pediatric patients undergoing emergency gastric lavage: a cross‑sectional survey.Translational pediatrics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEffective management and communication of diagnostic uncertainty are critical, yet understudied, drivers of patient safety in pediatric emergency care. We explored how clinicians manage and communicate diagnostic uncertainty and identified opportunities for intervention.
methodsFour 1-hour-long focus groups were conducted with 19 geographically diverse emergency medicine physicians. Discussions focused on clinical vignettes with diagnostic uncertainty. Reflexive thematic analysis was used to generate themes.
resultsParticipants described diagnostic uncertainty as a multidimensional experience involving complex interactions between the clinician, caregiver, and context. We identified 3 distinct themes: (1) Intersection of clinician's usual practice pattern with caregiver and contextual factors: Within the guardrails of safety and evidence-based care, clinicians adjust management and communication to caregiver expectations, health literacy, resources, acuity, and volume. (2) Synergies at the clinician, caregiver, and context interfaces: Shared decision-making, decision support tools, and primary care continuity facilitate clinician-caregiver alignment and safety. (3) Tensions at the interfaces: Perceived misaligned clinician-caregiver expectations, space constraints, and limited access to care promote additional work-up and hinder communication. Participants highlighted intervention opportunities to promote patient safety in uncertainty and reduce ED work-up: (1) standard tools to communicate uncertainty, (2) disease-specific risk prediction models with visual aids to effectively communicate risk, (3) improvements to the physical space, and (4) interventions to streamline access to primary care.
conclusionDiagnostic uncertainty in pediatric emergency care is a multidimensional experience influenced by synergies and tensions between the clinician, caregiver, and context. Communication tools, decision-support strategies, and systems-level interventions can strengthen diagnostic safety in pediatric emergency care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.