Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42021535›Full record

ArticleThe European journal of neuroscience2026

Reverse Hierarchical Processing of Speech in Talker Identification.

Ja Young Choi, Shengyue Xiong, Jacie R McHaney, Bharath Chandrasekaran

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The European journal of neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ja Young ChoiDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0503-2779
Shengyue XiongDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, USA.
Jacie R McHaneyDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1148-4018
Bharath ChandrasekaranDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, USA.

Funding

National Science Foundation DRL2409652
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spoken language contains critical information related to "what" is being said as well as "who" is talking. Listeners use various cues from speech to identify talkers. Talkers can be identified primarily based on acoustic cues, but access to higher-level cues depends on the extent of language familiarity. Do listeners have greater processing costs when there is a greater number of cues available? Or do listeners leverage cues in a reverse hierarchical manner, using higher-level cues more strategically to reduce processing costs? Here, we leveraged multiple methodological approaches, including pupillometry, analysis of the behavioral error pattern, and drift diffusion models (DDMs), to examine the dynamics of how learners identify novel talkers and accrue sensory evidence, balance cue usage, and manage processing costs during talker identity learning. Native English-speaking adults learned to identify talkers in English and Mandarin, then were tested on recognizing them speaking new sentences, all while their pupillary responses, a proxy for processing cost, were recorded. Talker identification was more accurate and induced less pupil dilation in English relative to Mandarin. Analysis of error patterns showed that listeners relied more heavily on low-level acoustic features in Mandarin than English, and DDMs revealed that higher evidence accumulation rates were associated with smaller pupil dilation. These findings suggest that, whenever available, listeners primarily use higher-level abstract representations to identify talkers from the beginning of the learning process while relying on less efficient, lower-level features of speech sounds in unfamiliar languages, consistent with the predictions of the reverse hierarchical framework.

Indexed as

Recognition, PsychologySpeechSpeech PerceptionAdultCuesFemaleHumansLanguageLearningMalePupilYoung Adulthumanpupillometryspeechvoice

Identifiers

PMID42021535
PMCPMC13103613

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.