Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42021418›Full record

ArticleAnimal microbiome2026

Cattle feces are a reservoir of diverse Acinetobacter species with potential to spread antibiotic resistance genes.

Anitha Ravi, Violetta Shestivska, Priscila Thiago Dobbler, Hana Sechovcová, Martina Maixnerová, Jaroslav Semerád, Alena Nehasilová, Mariana Vadroňová, Iñaki Odriozola, Hana Šubrtová Salmonová and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animal microbiome, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Anitha RaviLaboratory of Environmental Microbiology, Institute of Microbiology of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Vídeňská 1083, Prague 4, 142 20, Czech Republic.
Violetta ShestivskaLaboratory of Bacterial Genetics, Centre for Epidemiology and Microbiology, National Institute of Public Health, Šrobárova 48, Prague 10, 100 00, Czech Republic.
Priscila Thiago DobblerLaboratory of Environmental Microbiology, Institute of Microbiology of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Vídeňská 1083, Prague 4, 142 20, Czech Republic.
Hana SechovcováDepartment of Microbiology, Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences, Kamýcká 129, Prague 6, 165 00, Czech Republic.
Martina MaixnerováLaboratory of Bacterial Genetics, Centre for Epidemiology and Microbiology, National Institute of Public Health, Šrobárova 48, Prague 10, 100 00, Czech Republic.
Jaroslav SemerádLaboratory of Environmental Biotechnology, Institute of Microbiology of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Vídeňská 1083, Prague 4, 142 20, Czech Republic.
Alena NehasilováLaboratory of Environmental Biotechnology, Institute of Microbiology of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Vídeňská 1083, Prague 4, 142 20, Czech Republic.
Mariana VadroňováDepartment of Microbiology, Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences, Kamýcká 129, Prague 6, 165 00, Czech Republic.
Iñaki OdriozolaLaboratory of Environmental Microbiology, Institute of Microbiology of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Vídeňská 1083, Prague 4, 142 20, Czech Republic.
Hana Šubrtová SalmonováDepartment of Microbiology, Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences, Kamýcká 129, Prague 6, 165 00, Czech Republic.
Tomáš VětrovskýLaboratory of Environmental Microbiology, Institute of Microbiology of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Vídeňská 1083, Prague 4, 142 20, Czech Republic.
Šárka MusilováDepartment of Microbiology, Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences, Kamýcká 129, Prague 6, 165 00, Czech Republic.
Tomáš CajthamlLaboratory of Environmental Biotechnology, Institute of Microbiology of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Vídeňská 1083, Prague 4, 142 20, Czech Republic.
Eva PěchoučkováDepartment of Microbiology, Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences, Kamýcká 129, Prague 6, 165 00, Czech Republic.
Alexandr NemecLaboratory of Bacterial Genetics, Centre for Epidemiology and Microbiology, National Institute of Public Health, Šrobárova 48, Prague 10, 100 00, Czech Republic. alexandr.nemec@szu.gov.cz.
Martina KyselkováLaboratory of Environmental Microbiology, Institute of Microbiology of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Vídeňská 1083, Prague 4, 142 20, Czech Republic. martina.kyselkova@biomed.cas.cz.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAntibiotic resistance poses a major threat to human health, with antibiotic use in livestock contributing to the selection and spread of resistance genes. The genus Acinetobacter includes human- and animal-associated species capable of acquiring resistance, yet their diversity and resistance potential in livestock remain far less explored than in humans. In this study, we investigated Acinetobacter in cattle feces from 28 Czech farms with contrasting antibiotic use, aiming to assess species composition, resistance profiles, and the potential for resistance dissemination. We applied an integrative approach combining strain isolation and characterization, enrichment cultures, metabarcoding, and shotgun metagenomics.

resultsCattle feces harbored diverse Acinetobacter species with A. indicus and A. pseudolwoffii being the core species based on both isolated strains and metabarcoding, while A. baumannii was less common. Acinetobacter species occurrence determined by metabarcoding was driven by multiple factors, including production type, herd size, and per-head antibiotic use, while their abundance was mostly influenced by sample type (higher in feces from the farm floor than in rectal samples) and production type (higher in dairy than in beef cattle). Remarkably, 37% of the 284 isolated strains could not be assigned to validly named species and represent at least 19 putative novel species. Decreased susceptibility due to acquired resistance was observed in 57 strains; notably, A. indicus and A. pseudolwoffii from antibiotic-using farms were less susceptible to streptomycin than those from antibiotic-free farms. Shotgun metagenomics revealed a greater richness of acquired resistance genes in antibiotic-using farms, including the clinically relevant carbapenemase gene bla

conclusionsDespite relatively strict regulations, Czech cattle farms constitute a reservoir of antibiotic-resistant Acinetobacter carrying mobile resistance genes of clinical concern. Commonly applied antibiotics likely co-select for such genes, posing an ongoing public health risk. Our findings reveal an unexpectedly high diversity of Acinetobacter spp. in cattle, highlighting the research bias toward human-associated species and underscoring the need for integrated One Health monitoring approaches.

Indexed as

Antibiotic susceptibilityCarbapenemaseCattle farmDiversityIdentificationMALDI-TOF MSMetabarcodingMetagenomicsrpoB

Identifiers

PMID42021418
PMCPMC13185236

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.