ArticleAnimal microbiome2026
Cattle feces are a reservoir of diverse Acinetobacter species with potential to spread antibiotic resistance genes.
Article in Animal microbiome, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Single-contig bacterial genomes recovered from cattle fecal metagenomes at farms with variable antibiotic use.Research square · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAntibiotic resistance poses a major threat to human health, with antibiotic use in livestock contributing to the selection and spread of resistance genes. The genus Acinetobacter includes human- and animal-associated species capable of acquiring resistance, yet their diversity and resistance potential in livestock remain far less explored than in humans. In this study, we investigated Acinetobacter in cattle feces from 28 Czech farms with contrasting antibiotic use, aiming to assess species composition, resistance profiles, and the potential for resistance dissemination. We applied an integrative approach combining strain isolation and characterization, enrichment cultures, metabarcoding, and shotgun metagenomics.
resultsCattle feces harbored diverse Acinetobacter species with A. indicus and A. pseudolwoffii being the core species based on both isolated strains and metabarcoding, while A. baumannii was less common. Acinetobacter species occurrence determined by metabarcoding was driven by multiple factors, including production type, herd size, and per-head antibiotic use, while their abundance was mostly influenced by sample type (higher in feces from the farm floor than in rectal samples) and production type (higher in dairy than in beef cattle). Remarkably, 37% of the 284 isolated strains could not be assigned to validly named species and represent at least 19 putative novel species. Decreased susceptibility due to acquired resistance was observed in 57 strains; notably, A. indicus and A. pseudolwoffii from antibiotic-using farms were less susceptible to streptomycin than those from antibiotic-free farms. Shotgun metagenomics revealed a greater richness of acquired resistance genes in antibiotic-using farms, including the clinically relevant carbapenemase gene bla
conclusionsDespite relatively strict regulations, Czech cattle farms constitute a reservoir of antibiotic-resistant Acinetobacter carrying mobile resistance genes of clinical concern. Commonly applied antibiotics likely co-select for such genes, posing an ongoing public health risk. Our findings reveal an unexpectedly high diversity of Acinetobacter spp. in cattle, highlighting the research bias toward human-associated species and underscoring the need for integrated One Health monitoring approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.