Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42021411›Full record

ArticleBMC global and public health2026

Validation of a mobile application for prehospital transport time data collection in Kigali, Rwanda.

Teresa Bell, Jean Marie Uwitonze, Michael Oravic, Rebecca Maine, Jeanne d'Arc Nyinawankusi, Andrea N Davis, Jean Nepomuscene Sindikubwabo, Robert Rickard, Melissa H Watt, Justine Davies and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC global and public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Teresa Bell *Department of Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Jean Marie Uwitonze *Rwanda Biomedical Centre, Ministry of Health, Kigali, Rwanda.
Michael Oravic *Geisinger Commonwealth School of Medicine, Scranton, PA, USA.
Rebecca MaineDepartment of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Jeanne d'Arc NyinawankusiRwanda Biomedical Centre, Ministry of Health, Kigali, Rwanda.
Andrea N DavisDepartment of Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Jean Nepomuscene SindikubwaboRwanda Biomedical Centre, Ministry of Health, Kigali, Rwanda.
Robert RickardRwanda Build Program, Common World Inc., Kigali, Rwanda.
Melissa H WattDepartment of Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Justine DaviesDepartment of Applied Health Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Menelas NkeshimanaMinistry of Health, Government of Rwanda, Kigali, Rwanda.
Sudha JayaramanDepartment of Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA. Sudha.Jayaraman@hsc.utah.edu.

Funding

NIH HHS 1R21TW011636-01A1UK NIHR RIGHT NIHR203062
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEmergency medical services (EMS) are critical for patient outcomes during emergencies. Organised EMS systems that can promptly locate patients, deliver on-scene care, and transport patients to appropriate facilities are lacking in low- and middle-income countries. Through a long-standing partnership with Rwanda's Service d'Aide Médicale d'Urgence (SAMU), we developed and implemented an electronic application to capture prehospital times in Kigali, Rwanda. This study validates the accuracy of electronically captured data and establishes baseline response times for emergencies in Kigali.

methodsProspective data on prehospital transport times in Kigali collected from July 2022 to December 2023 were captured using a novel electronic application custom-built by Rwanda Build program (RWB), a local software accelerator in Kigali. RWB data were compared to SAMU's manually collected data to validate the accuracy of the electronically captured data. Datasets were deterministically linked using patient identifications (ID). Cases with missing patient ID were probabilistically linked using RWB deploy time compared to the paper dataset's leave time. The primary outcome was total prehospital time, from ambulance deployment to healthcare facility arrival. Secondary outcomes included time intervals of deployment to scene, on scene, scene to healthcare facility, and handoff times. Additional analyses compared response times of subgroups captured by RWB, including emergency type, severity, and prehospital delays.

resultsAfter SAMU and RWB data linkage, 6209 patients were included. The primary outcome, total time of ambulance deployment to hospital arrival, took an average of 54.5 min (standard deviation (SD) = 22.2) with a 0.53-min difference between paper records and the electronically captured dataset. The 30-s difference suggests the newly implemented electronic collection system is consistent with data recorded manually on EMS run reports. Trauma represented the most common emergency (65.2%), with an average prehospital time of 52.2 min (SD = 21.4). "Severe" emergencies took an average of 20 min longer to reach hospitals than "mild" cases (p < 0.001). Transit delays and districts with fewer transports were also associated with longer prehospital times.

conclusionsEMS is critical to healthcare systems. This study validated an electronic data-collection system to improve EMS services in Rwanda. This is one of the first studies to document EMS quality benchmarks in a sub-Saharan African country.

Indexed as

Emergency medical servicesLow- and middle-income countriesPatient transportPrehospital carePrehospital transport timesRwandaRwanda Build program

Identifiers

PMID42021411
PMCPMC13104385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.