Observational studyWorld journal of emergency surgery : WJES2026
A description of patient experience after undergoing an emergency laparotomy.
Observational study in World journal of emergency surgery : WJES, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo date, emergency laparotomy outcomes have centred on mortality, while survivorship remains inadequately defined and underexplored. It is expected that survivors are likely to experience significant short- and long-term biopsychosocial challenges and research is key to improving our understanding and identifying areas for improvement. This study aims to describe the emergency laparotomy postoperative pathway and evaluate short- and long-term outcomes.
methodsThis was a retrospective observational study across three NHS hospitals in Scotland, England and Wales. All patients had undergone emergency laparotomy between December 2017 and January 2019 according to the established National Emergency Laparotomy Audit criteria. Inpatient and post-discharge data were collected, including in-hospital complications, planned surgical follow-up, and unplanned follow-up (representation, readmission, and primary care referrals).
resultsOver the 14-month period, 557 patients were included (Scotland n = 199, Wales n = 252, and England n = 106), with 51.7% female and a median age of 65 years (IQR, 52–75 years). A total of 64.5% of patients had planned surgical follow-up, with a median interval of 9 weeks (IQR, 5–15 weeks). Within 30 days of discharge, 19.3% of patients represented to hospital and 13.3% required readmission. Within two years of discharge, 23.2% had primary care referrals to specialists, primarily general surgery and gastroenterology.
conclusionEmergency laparotomy is associated with a complex recovery trajectory, with significant variation described. Many patients did not receive planned follow-up, and among those who did, timelines vary from 1 to 4 months. Given the high rates of unplanned follow-up, defining and improving survivorship is urgently needed for this vulnerable patient population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.